Synthesis and Dissemination: Web-Based Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention
Overview
This paper synthesizes two research sources addressing substance abuse screening and intervention in adolescents: a clinical practice guideline by Davidson et al. (2020) and a randomized controlled trial by Arnaud et al. (2016). The analysis compares the research aims, study designs, populations, and methods to evaluate how web-based interventions can effectively reduce harmful drug and alcohol use among adolescents aged 12-18 years across multiple countries.
What this coursework covers
- Synthesis Table comparing clinical practice guideline and randomized controlled trial
- Research Question and Objective analysis for both studies
- Research Aim and Design Matching evaluation
- Study Population and Setting characteristics
- Methods and procedural steps summary
Preview
Synthesis and Dissemination
Student Name
Course Faculty
Term
Synthesis Table
Clinical Practice Guideline (Davidson et al., 2020) | Randomized Controlled Trial (Arnaud et al., 2016) | |
Research Question/ Objective | The authors premised that 12% of adults and 8% of adolescents (12-17 years) report harmful, illegal drugs and alcohol use in the USA. Thus, the article's objective was to update screening (by asking questions) recommendations to address this population. | The authors premise that mid-to-late adolescence is a critical period for initiating drug and alcohol problems that can be reduced by brief motivation intervention. With the advent of digital media, web-based interventions are handy because they are widely accessible and accepted, with promising results in reducing substance abuse. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a fully automated and targeted web-based intervention exclusive of face-to-face components. |
Research Aim Matched Design Yes/No | The article is not systematic research, and therefore, there is little or no connection between aim and design. It involved an update on the current USPSTF screening recommendation based on existing evidence. | The research aim matched the research design in several ways. Firstly, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a web-based intervention. To this end, the study was designed to sort and access all participants through web-based tools. Further, the authors premised that web-based interventions are acceptable and accessible. This was clear because participants were drawn across different countries, highlighting how easy it is to use web-based tools to access the target population. More Public Health samples |