Why Japan and China had a Markedly Different Response to European Imperialism

Overview

This paper reflects on course content examining why Japan and China responded differently to European imperialism in the 18th and 19th centuries. The author argues that temporal differences in European contact, power imbalances, internal political stability, and economic factors such as the opium trade and naval deterioration determined each nation's divergent strategies of either resistance or adaptation.

What this reflection paper covers

Preview

Why Japan and China had a Markedly Different Response to European Imperialism: A Reflection on Course Content

Your Name

Department of ABC, University – Whitewater

ABC 101: Course Name

Professor (or Dr.) Firstname Lastname

Date

Why Japan and China had a Markedly Different Response to European Imperialism: A Reflection on Course Content

Throughout the course, a key theme has been the role of imperialism in forming the modern world. Imperialism may involve colonialism (direct control of foreign territory) or domination of foreign territory without taking direct control. The latter was influenced more by preferential trade agreements. As summarized by Lord Sherburne (1737-1805), “England preferred trade without domination where possible, but accepted trade with domination when necessary” (Lecture 4). A key outcome of imperialism is that countries or territories on the receiving end had to adapt to changes or be left in oblivion. This can be highlighted when parallels are drawn based on the responses of China and Japan to European imperialism.

Factors that Influenced Different Responses

Before Europeans shifted their focus to Africa and Asia following resistance and independence in the Americas, China and Japan were among the most advanced countries in the world. For instance, between the 1600s and 1700s, the Chinese Empire was the most sophisticated and powerful state on the planet (Lecture 1). The economy and technology outshone all places on the planet, and their fleets had already reached East Africa. Japan was equally as developed, though smaller and less powerful, and was equally as advanced.

More History samples