International Relations Theory in Arrival: Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism
Overview
This essay analyzes the 2016 film Arrival through the lens of international relations theory, examining three major theoretical frameworks: realism, liberalism, and constructivism. The paper explores how these political philosophies manifest in the film's themes and scenes, with particular attention to the distinction between classical and radical realism, and how liberal cooperation contrasts with realist state prioritization.
What this essay covers
- Introduction establishing three primary international relations themes in Arrival
- Detailed explanation of realism theory, distinguishing classical from radical realism approaches
- Analysis of liberalism as a cooperative framework emphasizing democracy and international unity
Preview
Arrival Movie Review
Institution’s Name
Student’s Name
Course
Professor
Date
Arrival Movie Review
Introduction
There are several themes brought to life in the 2016 movie, Arrival. This essay shall explore some of the moral, philosophical, and political themes and motifs present in the film’s many different scenes. Three themes, in particular, shall be delved into deeply, and these are realism, liberalism, and constructivism.
Realism, sometimes referred to as political realism, refers to the concept that in the relationships between countries or states, each state prioritizes and is most concerned with its national security. It suggests that states will always make their decisions based on their best national interests. Realism believes that each independent state will always value its national security more than the overall security or international interests of its nations. Realism also connotes a strong skepticism towards the significance and salience of ethics and morals and their roles in international relations between states.
Realists commonly believe that the rule of law applies pragmatically only within the republic and jurisdiction of a country but that the international ball-game is wild and dynamic even in the application of law towards international relations. It is, however, essential to note that there is a difference between classical or traditional realism and radical or extreme realism. Classical realism does acknowledge the salient value of ethics and moral inclinations, not just within the state but also without it. In other words, classical realism agrees to the concept of applying ethics and moralities even in international relations.
Radical realism is starkly different, however.