Informative Speech Evaluation Rubric and Assessment Criteria

Overview

This is an evaluation form for assessing informative speeches across multiple dimensions including outline quality, introduction effectiveness, organization, supporting material, conclusion, and delivery. The rubric uses a standardized scoring system with categories of Below, Meets, and Above expectations, providing detailed feedback on speaker performance with a final grade of 91/100.

What this presentation covers

Preview

Informative Speech Evaluation Form

Speaker ___________________________________________________ Date ____________ Section ______

OUTLINE

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

  1. Formatted properly
  1. Comprehensive/Complete

Comments: See outline for details. 18/20 points

INTRODUCTION

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

  1. Started with an appropriate and effective attention-getter
  1. Clearly stated topic and purpose
  1. Stated the topic and speech's relevance to audience
  1. Established credibility
  1. Effectively previewed main points

Comments: 13/15 points

ORGANIZATION

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

  1. Limited number of main points (2-5)
  1. Main points easy to identify
  1. Main points arranged in logical pattern and easy to follow
  1. Main points balanced
  1. Transitioned smoothly & clearly from one topic to the next

Comments: 14/15 points

SUPPORTING MATERIAL

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

  1. Effectively used visual aid(s)
  1. Effective evidence and support

____ Statistics ____ Quotes ____ Comparisons ____ Testimony

____ Examples ____Narrative/anecdote ____ Facts ____ Other

  1. Effectively cited sources

Comments: 13/15 points

CONCLUSION

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

16. Signaled the end of speech was nearing

17. Adequate review of speech purpose and main points

18. Restated the relevance of topic and speech for audience

19. Clear and memorable concluding statement

Comments: 13/15 points

DELIVERY

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

20. Relaxed, confident posture and appearance

21. Effective eye contact

22. Natural, conversational quality; speech flowed smoothly

23. Avoided distracting mannerisms

24. Proper articulation/pronunciation

25. Communicated proper emotion/enthusiasm for topic

Comments: 15/15 points

PRESENTATION AS A WHOLE

Expectations

Below

Meets

Above

26. Appropriate use of language; avoided vocal fillers

27. Suited to audience and assignment

28. Generally followed outline

29. Held interest of audience

Comments: 5/5 points

TIME: ______6:49_____ (5-7 minutes)

SUBTOTAL: ________91_________

DEDUCTION(S): ________9___________

____0___ Over/under target time (-1 for every 10 seconds)

____0___ Late

____0___ Disruptive "listener"

____0___ Other

FINAL GRADE: ______________91______ / 100

More Communication samples