E013 is a graduate course in Western Governors University's Master of Science, Information Technology. It is also part of the Information Technology Product Management route, and WGU lists no prerequisites.
WGU describes it as a foundation for technology leaders who need to judge the value and cost of an organization's technology. You learn the essentials of financial literacy for the technology branch of a business, so that you can discuss budgets with finance colleagues on equal terms.
Many students come from technical roles and have rarely owned a budget. The difficulty is not complicated mathematics. It is explaining what a figure means for a decision, which is the skill the three competencies test.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Course | E013, Financial Planning for IT Professionals |
| Competency units | 3 |
| Level | Graduate |
| Programs | MS Information Technology; MS Information Technology, Product Management |
| Prerequisites | None listed |
What E013 Covers
The program guidebook lists three competencies. Each one maps to a different kind of financial thinking.
| Competency (WGU wording, summarized) | What it asks of you |
|---|---|
| Analyze the key financial indicators that drive IT performance | Read budgets and tracking tools and say what they reveal |
| Benchmark the current financial value of an organizational technology | Compare what a technology costs and delivers against a reference point |
| Determine the ROI and financial value of a technology change | Predict the return of a proposed change and justify the assumptions |
Together they follow the life of a technology decision: understand the current spend, judge what it is worth, then argue for a change.
Key Concepts Explained
Budget Versus Actual
A budget is a plan; a tracking report shows what happened. The gap between them, a variance, is where the questions start. A technology leader asks whether the gap is a timing issue, a price change, or a sign that the original estimate was wrong.
Return on Investment
ROI compares the net benefit of a change with its cost. A simple version is (benefit minus cost) divided by cost. Stronger answers also show when the benefit arrives, because money received in year three is worth less than money saved in year one.
Illustration: A firm spends 120,000 to replace an aging ticketing system and expects to save 50,000 a year in support time for three years. Total benefit is 150,000, so simple ROI is (150,000 - 120,000) / 120,000 = 25%. A good answer then adds that the saving depends on adoption, and shows what happens to ROI if the saving is 35,000 instead.
Benchmarking
A number means little alone. Benchmarking sets a technology's cost or performance beside an internal target, a previous year or an industry reference, so the reader can see whether it is high, low or normal.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
WGU courses are competency based, so work is normally submitted as a written task and judged against the competencies. Check your task instructions for the exact format.
| Task element | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Interpreting budget data | Reading indicators, not copying them | Pick the figures that matter and state what each one means |
| Benchmarking a technology | Judging current value | Name the reference point and explain why it is fair |
| Predicting ROI | Reasoning about future benefit | List assumptions, show the calculation, test one alternative |
| Recommendation | Business judgment | Give a clear answer and the risks attached to it |
Working Through the Three Competencies
Treat the three competencies as three passes over the same case. On the first pass, read the financial material only to understand the organization: what it spends on technology, where the money goes and what the tracking tools show. Write a few lines of plain observation for each indicator before you attempt any calculation.
On the second pass, choose the benchmark. Decide whether you are comparing against a target, a past period or an industry reference, and say why that choice is fair. A benchmark you cannot defend weakens everything built on it.
On the third pass, build the ROI. Keep inputs in one place, calculate the result, then change the two or three assumptions you are least sure of and note what happens. That small sensitivity check is often the difference between restating numbers and analyzing them.
| Pass | Output to produce |
|---|---|
| 1. Indicators | Short notes on what each budget or tracking figure signals |
| 2. Benchmark | A named reference point and a sentence defending it |
| 3. ROI | Formula, inputs, result and one alternative scenario |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Restating the figures. Repeating the numbers from the case is not analysis. Say what changed, why it matters and what you would do.
- Hidden assumptions. An ROI is only as good as its inputs. Write the assumptions down and justify each.
- Ignoring ongoing costs. Licenses, support and training often outweigh the purchase price.
- Mixing time periods. Compare like with like, such as annual costs against annual benefits.
Study Tips for E013
- Build one small spreadsheet for ROI and reuse it, changing only the inputs.
- Match every rubric line to a heading in your answer so nothing is missed.
- Add one sentence under each table saying what a manager should conclude.
- Use the course planning tool report with your instructor to decide where to spend your time.
How We Help with E013
Send the task instructions, any data tables and the rubric. A writer with a finance background can prepare a custom analysis, explain the ROI method step by step, or review your own draft for gaps. Our work is a study and reference aid: use it to understand the method, then complete and submit your own work under WGU's academic integrity policy.
GradeEssays is independent of Western Governors University. Every order is written from scratch, includes free revisions within the scope of your original request, and is refunded in full if it is late. For related support, see our finance assignment help guide.
Make Sense of Your E013 Numbers
Share the task, your workings and any evaluator feedback. We explain the method so your next draft shows real analysis.
Start My E013 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
The WGU program guidebook lists none.
The arithmetic is modest. The harder part is interpreting figures and explaining a recommendation.
Both the MS Information Technology and the MS Information Technology, Product Management programs list Financial Planning for IT Professionals.
The guidebook lists it at 3 competency units.
State the formula, list your assumptions, show the numbers and test at least one alternative scenario.
Yes. Send the task and rubric and we review the draft for gaps, explain corrections and suggest improvements.