C854 is where MSN Nursing Informatics students work in a practice setting and begin a proposal to improve an existing health information system.
WGU describes the course as clinical or practice experiences in authentic activities relevant to the informatics nurse role.
Students analyze an existing health information system to determine the need for a system optimization that improves the organization's ability to measure and report Triple Aim objectives. The proposal continues into C855, the Nursing Informatics Capstone.
The challenge is scope. A good proposal targets one system problem tightly enough to analyze, design and test within the course, while still connecting to the Triple Aim.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Course code | C854 |
| Level | Graduate (MSN), competency-based |
| Program | MSN Nursing Informatics |
| Format | Practice experience plus written proposal work |
| Followed by | C855 Nursing Informatics Capstone |
Practice Experience and Documentation
Field experience courses involve practice hours with a preceptor or site, plus documentation. WGU sets the hour and site requirements, so check your course page and field experience handbook. In general, expect to:
- Arrange an approved site and preceptor ahead of time.
- Log activities and hours accurately as you go.
- Gather information about the system, its users and its data without breaching confidentiality.
- Use what you observe to define the optimization problem.
Key Concepts Explained
The Triple Aim
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim has three goals: better patient experience of care, better population health and lower per capita cost. In C854, the optimization should help the organization measure and report one or more of these.
Proposal Sections and the SDLC
Student proposals typically include an introduction, a literature review and the early system development life cycle phases: planning and analysis, design and build, and implementation and testing. The final phase (monitoring, maintenance, support and evaluation) is completed in C855.
Example: A unit cannot reliably report falls with injury because nurses record falls in free text. The optimization adds structured fields to the fall documentation. Analysis maps current workflow and data gaps; design specifies the fields and a report; testing checks that test entries produce accurate counts. The link to the Triple Aim is safer care and cost avoidance from fewer injuries.
Working with Stakeholders
Informatics nurses sit between clinicians, IT staff and managers. Your analysis is stronger when it shows each group's view: nurses on workflow burden, IT on technical feasibility and managers on reporting needs.
Short, structured conversations during practice hours (without recording identifiable information) can reveal why a system is used the way it is, which is often the real cause of a data gap.
Writing the Literature Review
The literature review justifies your optimization. It should show what is already known about the problem, what solutions have worked elsewhere, and what that means for your setting.
A practical approach:
- Search CINAHL and PubMed with terms for the problem, the technology and the outcome.
- Keep sources recent unless a classic study is essential, and check your rubric for any date limit.
- Group findings by theme (for example, data quality, user acceptance, measured outcomes).
- End each theme with what it means for your proposal.
A summary table of sources, with design, findings and relevance, makes the review easier to write and easier for evaluators to follow.
Typical Tasks and How to Approach Them
| Section | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Problem and system analysis | Defining a real gap | Describe current workflow and the data it fails to capture |
| Literature review | Evidence for the change | Use recent, peer-reviewed sources; synthesize, do not list |
| Design and build | Specifying the solution | State requirements, users and the data flow |
| Implementation and testing | Planning roll-out | Cover training, go-live support and test cases |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Too broad. "Improve the EHR" is not a project. Pick one workflow and one measure.
- Weak Triple Aim link. Say exactly which aim the change supports and how it will be measured.
- Literature lists. Summarizing articles one by one does not show synthesis.
- Privacy slips. Never include identifiable patient data in a proposal.
Study Tips for C854
- Choose a problem your preceptor cares about; access to information is easier.
- Keep a running source table with findings and relevance.
- Draft the problem statement first and test every later section against it.
- Plan with C855 in mind so the final phase follows naturally.
How We Help with C854
Send the task, rubric, your system notes and any evaluator comments. A nursing informatics writer helps you narrow the problem, models proposal sections, reviews your literature synthesis or edits your draft. See our nursing informatics assignment help guide for wider support.
GradeEssays is independent of Western Governors University. We never invent practice hours, site data or experiences, and we never log in to student portals. Use our work as a model and write and submit your own proposal under WGU's academic integrity rules. Every order is written from scratch, with free revisions within the scope of your original request.
Build a Strong C854 Proposal
Share the task, rubric and your system notes. We prepare model sections and feedback you can learn from.
Start My C854 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
Practice experiences in the informatics nurse role and the analysis of an existing health information system to propose an optimization that improves Triple Aim measurement and reporting.
The proposal started in C854 is finalized in C855, where you plan the last SDLC phase: monitoring, maintenance, support and evaluation.
IHI's framework of better patient experience, better population health and lower per capita cost.
Look for a workflow where data is missing, duplicated or unreliable, and where better data would support one Triple Aim goal.
No. Hours and logs must reflect your own practice experience. We help with the written proposal and understanding.
No. We are independent and not connected with Western Governors University.