Home / Courses / BHA3004
Capella University — BS Health Care Administration

BHA3004: Ensuring Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Healthcare

A complete guide to Capella's BHA3004. Students examine quality improvement and risk management in healthcare, applying models such as PDCA, Six Sigma, and Rapid Cycle Improvement to increase patient care quality and decrease litigation risk.

Undergraduate6 CreditsHealth Care Administration

BHA3004 gives future healthcare administrators the quality-improvement toolkit they'll be expected to use on the job — building quality dashboards and applying frameworks like PDCA, Six Sigma, and Rapid Cycle Improvement to raise care quality while reducing litigation risk.

Quality improvement and risk management frameworks

Core topics

  • Quality improvement models: Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA); Six Sigma; and Rapid Cycle Improvement
  • Risk management: Reducing the risk of litigation through proactive quality practices
  • Statistical analysis for quality: Using statistical tools to evaluate and improve patient care outcomes
  • Quality dashboards: Preparing dashboards that track and communicate quality performance

BHA3004 assignments include quality dashboard projects and risk-management case analyses

Our health care administration specialists deliver expert support for BHA3004.

Get Expert Help

Get Help With BHA3004

Quality dashboards and risk-management analyses.

Place Your OrderView All Services

Related courses

Frequently asked questions

Why does BHA3004 teach multiple quality-improvement frameworks — PDCA, Six Sigma, and Rapid Cycle Improvement — instead of just one?

No single quality-improvement methodology fits every healthcare situation: PDCA works well for incremental, ongoing process changes; Six Sigma is suited to reducing variation and defects in more data-intensive processes; and Rapid Cycle Improvement is designed for testing changes quickly in fast-moving clinical settings. Capella exposes students to all three because real healthcare administrators need to recognize which tool fits a given quality or safety problem, rather than forcing every issue through the lens of a single framework they happened to learn first.