University of Maryland Global Campus

HMGT 372: Legal and Ethical Issues in Health Care

A guide to UMGC's HMGT 372, which applies ethical principles and legal standards to the decisions health care managers face.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

HMGT 372 at the University of Maryland Global Campus examines legal and ethical issues encountered in health care management and their effects on the delivery of health services and patient care. UMGC lists HMGT 300 or NURS 300 as the prerequisite.

The stated aim is to apply ethical principles and practice within the legal and ethical standards of health care. Students often find the difficulty is separating what the law requires from what ethics asks, since the two do not always agree.

Because cases rarely have one correct answer, marks go to reasoning that is structured, balanced and supported by sources.

Course at a Glance

ItemDetails
UniversityUniversity of Maryland Global Campus
Course codeHMGT 372 (3 credits)
PrerequisiteHMGT 300 or NURS 300
LevelUpper-level undergraduate
Subject areaHealth law and ethics for managers
Typical workCase analyses, discussions and short papers (general; check your syllabus)

What HMGT 372 Covers

Key Concepts Explained

Four Common Ethical Principles

Health care ethics is often organized around autonomy (respecting choices), beneficence (doing good), non-maleficence (avoiding harm) and justice (fairness). A strong analysis names which principles are in tension.

Invented illustration: A facility has one available bed and two patients in need. Justice asks for a fair allocation rule; beneficence favors the patient who benefits most; autonomy concerns informed participation. The analysis explains the conflict and defends a stated decision rule.

Law Versus Ethics

Something can be legal yet ethically questionable, or ethical yet legally risky. State the legal requirement first, then the ethical considerations, then your recommendation.

Managerial Accountability

Managers are responsible for policies, training and monitoring that reduce harm. Link your recommendation to a concrete organizational step, such as a policy review or staff education.

Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them

TypeTestsApproach
Ethical case analysisStructured reasoningIdentify facts, principles in conflict, options, recommendation
Legal issue paperUnderstanding of standardsUse primary or authoritative sources and state the date
Discussion postReasoned positionTake a view and answer the strongest objection

A Five-Step Ethics Framework

StepDo this
1. FactsSummarize what is known and unknown
2. LawState the relevant legal duty
3. PrinciplesIdentify the ethical principles in conflict
4. OptionsCompare two or three actions and their consequences
5. DecisionRecommend one and justify it

Worked Example: A Short Ethical Analysis

Consider this invented scenario. A clinic manager learns that a staff member viewed the records of a neighbor without a work reason. The manager must decide how to respond.

Model reasoning (invented): The legal question is whether patient privacy rules were breached and what reporting duties follow, which the organization's compliance officer and counsel should confirm. The ethical principles in tension are respect for patient confidentiality, fairness to the employee and the duty to protect other patients. Options include coaching, formal discipline or escalation. A defensible recommendation is to investigate promptly, apply the policy consistently and review access controls so the issue is less likely to recur.

The answer does not claim to give legal advice. It identifies the legal question, applies principles and ends with an organizational action. That shape works for most cases.

Using Legal and Ethical Sources

Cite authoritative sources: statutes and regulations from government sites, professional codes of ethics, and peer-reviewed commentary. Check the date, because legal standards change and vary by state.

When you quote a principle, link it to the situation. A sentence that merely defines autonomy earns less than one that shows how respecting a patient's informed choice changes what the manager should do.

Writing About Confidentiality and Consent

Confidentiality and informed consent are common topics in a course on legal and ethical issues. Treat them as examples of how duties apply, not as terms to define.

Explain what the duty protects, who owes it and what exceptions are recognized. Then apply it to a management scenario, such as how a records policy should handle access by staff. Cite authoritative sources, state the date and note that rules vary by state. Avoid statements such as "the law always requires" unless a source supports them.

Where Students Get Stuck

Study Tips for HMGT 372

How We Help with HMGT 372

Send the case, rubric and readings. We prepare a custom analysis, discuss your reasoning or edit your draft. Our writers do not give legal advice.

GradeEssays is independent of the University of Maryland Global Campus. Our help is a study aid; submit only your own work under UMGC's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch, include free revisions within the scope of your original request and are refunded in full if late.

Strengthen Your HMGT 372 Case Analysis

Share your case and draft. We prepare a custom analysis or detailed feedback.

Start My HMGT 372 Help

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the prerequisite for HMGT 372?

UMGC lists HMGT 300 or NURS 300.

Is this a law course?

It examines legal and ethical issues in health care management; it is not a law degree course.

What is the difference between legal and ethical duties?

Legal duties are set by law; ethical duties come from professional and moral principles and may go beyond the law.

How do I structure an ethics case?

Use facts, law, principles, options and decision.

Do you provide legal advice?

No; we provide academic study support only.

Can you complete my case for submission?

No; you submit your own work, using our models as study aids.