Western Governors University

D909: Healthcare Law and Ethics

A study guide to WGU's Healthcare Law and Ethics, the MHA course where legal and ethical principles meet real dilemmas, ending in an ethics case study.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

Healthcare Law and Ethics at Western Governors University (WGU) is a course in the Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA). It examines how law, ethics and healthcare practice interact.

WGU says learners complete an ethics case study as a summative project. That makes the course a test of reasoning: you must identify the legal and ethical issues in a real-world dilemma and justify a well-argued resolution.

Course at a Glance

ItemDetails
UniversityWestern Governors University (WGU)
Course codeD909 (codes can change; titles are the safer match)
LevelGraduate (Master of Healthcare Administration)
PrerequisitesNone, per WGU's course description
Subject areaHealthcare law, ethics, policy and professional conduct
Typical workAn ethics case study analyzing a dilemma and proposing a resolution

What D909 Covers

Area (from WGU's description)What it means in practice
Legal and ethical principles governing healthcareThe rules and values that guide decisions
Patient rightsConsent, privacy, access to information and respect for choices
Healthcare policyHow regulation shapes what organizations may and must do
Professional conductStandards expected of clinicians and administrators
Legal responsibilities of providers and organizationsDuties, liability and compliance

Key Concepts Explained

Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics

Autonomy (respect for choices), beneficence (doing good), nonmaleficence (avoiding harm) and justice (fairness) are widely used to structure ethical analysis. Dilemmas arise when two principles pull in different directions.

Example: A competent adult declines a recommended treatment. Autonomy supports respecting the decision, while beneficence and nonmaleficence raise concern about harm. A strong analysis confirms the patient has decision-making capacity, checks the refusal is informed, explores the reasons, documents the discussion and explains why respecting autonomy is justified in this case.

Law and Ethics Are Not the Same

Something can be legal but ethically troubling, or ethical but legally restricted. Name both questions in your analysis and say where they agree or diverge. Where the law differs by jurisdiction, say so and refer to the relevant rules.

Privacy and Consent

Privacy law such as HIPAA in the United States governs health information, and informed consent requires that patients understand the risks, benefits and alternatives. Use the exact terms your course materials define.

Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them

Task typeWhat it testsHow to approach it
Ethics case study (summative)Identifying issues and justifying a resolutionFacts, issues, principles, options, recommendation, justification
Legal responsibility analysisApplying duties to a scenarioState the duty, apply it to the facts and note the risk
Policy discussionUnderstanding regulationSummarize the policy, who it affects and its ethical implications
Professional conduct reflectionStandards of practiceLink a standard to a decision you would make

Ethics Case Study Structure

A repeatable structure keeps the analysis balanced. Spend roughly equal effort on analysis and justification.

SectionWhat to includeCommon slip
FactsWho, what and when, neutrallyMixing facts and opinion
IssuesThe legal and ethical questionsNaming only one
Principles and lawWhich apply and how they conflictListing without applying
OptionsAt least two realistic choices with consequencesA straw-man alternative
ResolutionThe recommendation and why it is bestNo acknowledgment of trade-offs

Practicing with a Short Scenario

Example: A family asks a clinic not to tell an elderly patient a serious diagnosis. Issues: patient right to information, the duty of honesty, family wishes and cultural context. A reasoned approach checks what the patient wants to know, explains that the patient generally has the right to their own information, offers to involve the family in the conversation and documents the discussion. Law and policy set limits on withholding information, so you would refer to the rules in your jurisdiction.

Notice the order: issues, principles, options and a reasoned recommendation.

Using Sources in Ethics and Law

Ground the analysis in authoritative sources: statutes and regulations, professional codes of ethics and recognized ethical frameworks. Distinguish what the law requires from what a code recommends.

Source typeWhat it gives you
Law and regulationBinding duties and limits
Professional codesStandards of conduct
Ethical frameworksA structure for reasoning
Organization policyHow duties apply locally

Where Students Get Stuck

Study Tips for D909

How We Help with D909

Send the prompt, rubric and the case you were given. A writer with healthcare experience prepares a model case analysis, reviews your draft or helps you structure the justification.

GradeEssays is independent of WGU. Our work is a study and reference aid and does not provide legal advice. Use it to learn the approach, then write and submit your own case study under WGU's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch, with free revisions within the scope of your original request and a full refund if late.

Make Sense of Your D909 Task

Share the prompt and rubric. A healthcare writer prepares a worked model case analysis for you to study.

Start My D909 Help

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

What does D909 cover?

WGU describes legal and ethical principles in healthcare, patient rights, healthcare policy, professional conduct and the legal responsibilities of providers and organizations.

What is the summative project?

An ethics case study, according to WGU's course description.

Are there prerequisites?

WGU's course description says there are none.

Do I need to cite laws?

Follow your task. Cite the sources your course expects and note jurisdiction where relevant.

What if two principles conflict?

Weigh them explicitly, explain which you prioritize and why, and state the trade-off.

Can you review my case study?

Yes. Send the task and draft and we check structure, reasoning and rubric coverage.