CMIT 320 is UMGC's core undergraduate course in computer and network security fundamentals, and the gateway to its ethical hacking course.
UMGC describes it as a study of the fundamental concepts of computer security and its implementation. The aim is to assess and mitigate risk, evaluate and select appropriate technologies, and apply proper security safeguards. The course is designed to help prepare for the CompTIA Security+ exam.
Students often find the breadth hard: cryptography, identity, networks, threats and policy all appear. The common thread is risk, and answers that keep returning to it tend to be the strongest.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) |
| Course code | CMIT 320 |
| Level | Undergraduate, 3 credits |
| Prerequisite | CMIT 265 or CompTIA Network+ certification |
| Certification link | Designed to help prepare for CompTIA Security+ |
| Leads to | Prerequisite for CMIT 321 (Ethical Hacking) |
What CMIT 320 Covers
- Risk: identifying threats and vulnerabilities and choosing responses.
- Security technologies: firewalls, intrusion detection, VPNs, endpoint protection.
- Cryptography: encryption, hashing and certificates.
- Identity and access: authentication, authorization and MFA.
- Safeguards: technical, administrative and physical controls.
Key Concepts Explained
The CIA Triad
Confidentiality, integrity and availability are the three goals of security. Most controls protect one or more of them, and good answers name which.
Example: Encrypting a laptop protects confidentiality if it is stolen. File hashing detects tampering, protecting integrity. Redundant power and backups protect availability. A scenario answer that maps each control to the triad shows clear reasoning.
Symmetric Versus Asymmetric Encryption
Symmetric encryption uses one shared key and is fast, suited to bulk data. Asymmetric encryption uses a public and private key pair, solving key exchange and enabling digital signatures. HTTPS uses both: asymmetric to agree a key, symmetric for the session.
Risk Response Options
Risks can be mitigated (reduced with controls), transferred (for example, through insurance), avoided (stop the activity) or accepted. Choosing among them depends on cost, likelihood and impact.
Authentication Factors
Authentication relies on something you know (a password), something you have (a phone or security key) or something you are (a fingerprint). Multi-factor authentication combines different categories, so two passwords do not count. Phishing-resistant methods such as hardware security keys are stronger than codes sent by text message, a distinction that often appears in scenario questions about protecting remote access.
Common Threats and Matching Controls
Security+ style questions often describe an attack and ask for the best control. A threat-to-control table is a useful revision tool:
| Threat | Typical controls |
|---|---|
| Phishing | Email filtering, training, MFA |
| Ransomware | Offline backups, patching, endpoint protection |
| Brute-force logins | Account lockout, MFA, strong password policy |
| Unpatched services | Vulnerability scanning, patch management |
| Data theft from lost laptops | Full-disk encryption, remote wipe |
In assignments, go one step further: explain why the control fits that organization and what risk remains afterwards.
Evaluating and Selecting Technologies
UMGC's aim includes evaluating and selecting appropriate technologies. In assignments, that means comparing options against the scenario, not listing features. A short comparison table works well:
| Criterion | Question to ask |
|---|---|
| Risk addressed | Which threat does it reduce? |
| Fit | Does it suit the organization's size and skills? |
| Cost | License, hardware and staff time |
| Trade-offs | Performance, usability or privacy impact |
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment | Identifying and rating risk | Link each risk to an asset and a control |
| Security plan | Selecting safeguards | Justify choices against the scenario |
| Virtual labs | Applying tools | Explain what each result demonstrates |
| Quizzes | Security+ concepts | Use acronym flashcards and practice questions |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Acronym overload. Security+ material is dense with acronyms; learn them in context.
- Tool lists instead of reasoning. Explain why a control fits the risk.
- Ignoring people and policy. Administrative controls matter as much as technical ones.
- Crypto confusion. Hashing is not encryption; it cannot be reversed.
Study Tips for CMIT 320
- Organize notes by the CIA triad and by control type.
- Read the current Security+ exam objectives for scope.
- Follow a reputable security news source for real examples.
- Explain each lab result in one sentence before moving on.
How We Help with CMIT 320
Send the scenario, lab instructions, rubric and your work. A security tutor can explain concepts, prepare a model risk assessment or plan, or review your report for accuracy and APA style. For scenario-based writing, see our case study writing guide.
GradeEssays is independent of the University of Maryland Global Campus and CompTIA. We provide tutoring and models; we never take quizzes or exams, sit certifications, or log in to your classroom or labs.
Strengthen Your CMIT 320 Security Work
Share the assignment, lab results and feedback. We prepare worked analyses you can learn from.
Start My CMIT 320 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
UMGC lists CMIT 265 or CompTIA Network+ certification.
UMGC says it is designed to help prepare for the Security+ exam, which is taken separately.
UMGC lists it as a 3-credit undergraduate course.
CMIT 321 (Ethical Hacking) lists CMIT 320 as its prerequisite.
It mixes technical topics with risk and safeguards, so expect both labs and written analysis.
Yes. We explain encryption, hashing and certificates with worked examples.