CCPA 890 is where your dissertation takes shape: you refine a topic, review the literature and build the conceptual model the rest of the study will test.
The University of Maryland Global Campus describes Dissertation Part I as the identification and refinement of the dissertation topic. The objective is to research questions relevant to the chosen topic, conduct a review of the literature and develop a conceptual model with associated hypotheses.
It is the first of four 3-credit dissertation courses (CCPA 890 to 893) in the Doctor of Management in Community College Policy and Administration. Decisions made here shape every later stage, which is why it is worth getting right.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) |
| Course code | CCPA 890 |
| Level and credits | Doctoral, 3 credits |
| Sequence | First of four dissertation courses (890, 891, 892, 893) |
| Credit note | Credit for only one of CCPA 890 or DMCC 890 |
| Main outputs | Refined topic, literature review, conceptual model and hypotheses |
What CCPA 890 Involves
| Stage | What you produce |
|---|---|
| Topic refinement | A focused, significant problem in community college policy or administration |
| Research questions | Questions that address the problem |
| Literature review | A critical synthesis of what is known and where gaps lie |
| Conceptual model | The proposed relationships among key concepts |
| Hypotheses | Testable statements derived from the model |
Key Concepts Explained
From Literature to Conceptual Model
A conceptual model is a visual and written account of how you expect key concepts to relate, built from theory and prior research. Each arrow in the model should be justified by the literature.
Example: Topic: retention of part-time faculty. The literature suggests that professional development access and inclusion in departmental decisions relate to job satisfaction, which in turn relates to intention to stay. The model links these concepts with arrows, each supported by cited studies.
Writing Hypotheses from the Model
Hypotheses translate arrows into testable statements. They should name the concepts, the expected direction and the population.
Example: H1: Among part-time faculty at community colleges, greater access to professional development is associated with higher job satisfaction. H2: Job satisfaction is positively associated with intention to stay. Each hypothesis maps to one arrow in the model.
Writing the Literature Review
A dissertation literature review is an argument, not a catalog. It shows what is known, how well it is known and why your study is needed.
- Organize by themes or concepts in your model, not by author.
- Evaluate study quality, not just findings.
- Show where studies agree, conflict or leave gaps.
- End with a clear statement of the gap your study addresses.
Our dissertation literature review guide covers this process in more detail.
Refining a Topic: A Worked Path
Topic refinement usually happens in several passes. Each pass makes the problem narrower, more significant and more feasible.
Pass 1: "Community college leadership." Far too broad.
Pass 2: "Leadership succession in community colleges." A real problem, but still wide.
Pass 3: "How mid-level administrators perceive readiness for presidential roles." Focused on a population and a concept.
Pass 4: "The relationship between participation in leadership development programs and self-rated readiness for senior roles among mid-level community college administrators." Now concepts, population and an expected relationship are clear, and a conceptual model can be built.
At each pass, ask three questions. Does the literature show this matters? Is there a gap? Can I get the data? If any answer is no, refine again before writing the review.
Working with Your Chair and Committee
Your dissertation chair and committee guide the work from this course onwards. Practical habits help:
- Agree on deadlines and how drafts should be submitted.
- Keep a log of feedback and how you responded to each point.
- Ask questions early rather than guessing what a comment means.
- Share your conceptual model as a diagram; it often speeds up discussion.
Where Students Get Stuck
- Topics too broad. Narrow until you can name concepts, population and setting.
- Reviews that summarize. Synthesis and critique are what committees look for.
- Models without support. Every relationship needs literature behind it.
- Hypotheses that cannot be tested. Check that each one could be measured with available data.
Study Tips for CCPA 890
- Choose a topic you can sustain interest in for several years.
- Check data access early; it affects feasibility.
- Use a reference manager from day one.
- Draw your model by hand before writing it up.
How We Help with CCPA 890
Send your topic notes, drafts and any committee feedback. A doctoral coach can help you refine a topic, give feedback on your literature review and model, and edit for clarity and APA style.
GradeEssays is independent of the University of Maryland Global Campus. Your dissertation must be your own work; we offer coaching, feedback, editing and model examples within UMGC's academic integrity rules, and never invent sources or data. Orders include free revisions within the scope of your original request and a full refund if late.
Move Your CCPA 890 Work Forward
Share your draft chapter and committee feedback. We give detailed feedback and editing you can act on.
Start My CCPA 890 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
UMGC describes it as identifying and refining the dissertation topic, researching relevant questions, reviewing the literature and developing a conceptual model with associated hypotheses.
UMGC lists four: CCPA 890, 891, 892 and 893, each 3 credits.
A visual and written account of the expected relationships among your key concepts, grounded in theory and prior research.
UMGC's description includes developing hypotheses associated with the conceptual model. Your committee will guide the exact form.
Follow your program's guidance and committee advice; the aim is thorough synthesis, not a set word count.
Yes. We provide feedback and editing for clarity, structure and APA style, keeping your ideas and voice.