C874 is the capstone of WGU's M.A. Mathematics Education (Secondary) program: you design, teach and analyze a multi-week mathematics unit.
WGU describes it as a comprehensive, original, research-based curriculum unit designed to meet an identified educational need, providing direct evidence of the candidate's ability to design and implement a multi-week, standards-based unit, assess student learning and reflect on the learning process. It follows the seven Teacher Performance Assessment components.
In secondary mathematics, the hard part is usually showing conceptual learning, not just procedural accuracy. Your goals, tasks and analysis should reveal whether students understand why a method works.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Course code | C874 |
| Level | Graduate capstone, competency-based |
| Program | M.A. Mathematics Education (Secondary, grades 5-12) |
| Main output | A taught, multi-week standards-based mathematics unit |
| Structure | Seven Teacher Performance Assessment components |
The Seven Components in a Secondary Math Unit
- Contextual factors: the school, the class and students' prior mathematics, with implications for teaching.
- Learning goals: standards-aligned goals that include reasoning, not only skills.
- Assessment: a pre-assessment, formative checks and a post-assessment tied to each goal.
- Design for instruction: lessons, tasks, representations and technology.
- Instructional decision-making: changes you made in response to evidence.
- Analysis of student learning: results for the class, subgroups and individuals.
- Self-evaluation and reflection: what worked and what you would change.
Designing for Conceptual Understanding
Goals That Include Reasoning
"Students will solve quadratic equations" describes a procedure. A stronger goal adds understanding: "Students will choose an efficient method to solve a quadratic and explain what the solutions mean on the graph."
Assessment Items That Reveal Thinking
Include items that ask students to explain, compare methods or find an error. These show misconceptions that a page of drill can hide.
Example: In a unit on linear functions, a post-assessment item shows a table, a graph and an equation, one of which does not match the others. Students identify the odd one out and justify their choice using slope and intercept. Scoring with a short rubric separates students who compute slope correctly from those who understand what it represents.
Analyzing Gains by Goal
Report pre- and post-results per learning goal, not just total scores. A class may improve overall while one goal (often the reasoning goal) stays weak, which is valuable for your reflection.
Choosing a Subgroup
The analysis component asks you to look beyond the whole class. Choose a subgroup that matters for the mathematics, such as students who scored lowest on the pre-assessment, English learners facing heavy word problems, or students receiving accommodations. Report their gains by goal and explain what the pattern suggests.
Representations, Technology and Discourse
Secondary mathematics standards expect students to move between representations: tables, graphs, equations, diagrams and words. Designing lessons around these moves gives you evidence of understanding to analyze later.
Technology can help when it serves a goal. Graphing tools let students test conjectures quickly; dynamic geometry software lets them drag figures and see which properties stay constant. Say in your design why each tool supports a specific goal.
Classroom discourse matters too. Planned questions such as "How do you know?" or "Will that always work?" push students to justify. Recording a few typical student responses during teaching (without names) gives you real material for instructional decision-making and reflection.
Example: During a lesson on exponential growth, an exit ticket shows many students treating repeated doubling as adding 2 each time. The next lesson opens with a table comparing linear and exponential patterns side by side, which becomes an entry in your decision-making component.
Working Through the Components
| Component | Common weakness | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Learning goals | Procedural only | Add a reasoning or communication goal |
| Design for instruction | Lecture-heavy | Include tasks with multiple representations |
| Decision-making | Generic changes | Tie each change to a formative result |
| Reflection | Self-praise | Discuss goals that were not met and why |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Weak pre-assessment. If it does not match the post-assessment, gains cannot be measured.
- Grade-level spread. Grades 5-12 is a wide band; make your contextual factors specific to the actual class.
- Subgroup analysis. Choose a meaningful group (for example, students with IEPs or English learners) and explain the result.
- Unit length. Plan enough lessons for real learning to show between assessments.
Study Tips for C874
- Map each standard to a goal and to specific assessment items before teaching.
- Keep a log of daily formative checks and what you changed.
- Use simple charts (pre versus post by goal) in the analysis.
- Reread the rubric before drafting each component.
How We Help with C874
Send the task, rubric, unit plan and any evaluator comments. A mathematics education writer reviews alignment, helps you present data, models component sections or edits your writing for clarity.
GradeEssays is independent of Western Governors University. We never invent student data or teaching experiences and never log in to student portals. You teach the unit and write your own submission under WGU's academic integrity rules. Every order is written from scratch, with free revisions within the scope of your original request.
Make Your C874 Unit Hold Together
Share the task, rubric and draft. We give feedback and model sections so you can complete your own.
Start My C874 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
The capstone Teacher Performance Assessment for WGU's M.A. Mathematics Education (Secondary): a multi-week, standards-based unit you plan, teach, assess and reflect on.
The program title covers grades 5-12. Your unit is taught to the class in your placement or classroom.
C887 is the equivalent assessment for the middle grades (5-9) program. C874 belongs to the secondary (5-12) program.
A topic you will teach anyway that has clear conceptual goals, such as linear functions, similarity or probability.
We can help you organize and interpret your own real data and model how to present it. The analysis you submit must be your own.
No. We are independent and not connected with Western Governors University.