ACC-691 is the second course in Southern New Hampshire University's graduate certificate in forensic accounting and fraud examination.
SNHU describes it as exploring more fully the detection and prevention methods and techniques for assessing risk and reducing fraud.
Students gain a deeper understanding of the COSO framework used to evaluate internal controls, examine fraud detection and prevention techniques and how they are implemented in industry, and apply relevant laws, regulations and ethical standards throughout. SNHU notes that the course covers content included in the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) exam.
Financial statement fraud is usually committed by people with authority, often senior management, which makes it harder to detect than theft by an employee. The challenge in this course is reading statements critically: seeing which numbers do not fit the business story, and explaining which controls should have stopped the manipulation.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) |
| Course code | ACC-691 |
| Level | Graduate |
| Program | Graduate certificate in forensic accounting and fraud examination (course 2 of 4) |
| Exam link | Covers content included in the CFE exam (per SNHU) |
| Typical work | Case analyses, ratio and trend tests, COSO-based control evaluations, prevention plans |
What ACC-691 Covers
| Area (from SNHU's description) | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| Risk assessment and fraud reduction | Identifying where and how statements could be manipulated |
| The COSO framework | Evaluating control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring |
| Detection and prevention techniques in industry | Analytical procedures, whistleblower hotlines, audit committee oversight |
| Laws, regulations and ethics | Sarbanes-Oxley, SEC enforcement, professional ethical standards |
Key Concepts Explained
Common Financial Statement Fraud Schemes
Schemes typically involve fictitious or premature revenue, concealed liabilities and expenses, improper asset valuation or misleading disclosures. Each leaves traces in the relationships between accounts.
Analytical Red Flags
Revenue that grows much faster than cash from operations, receivables rising faster than sales, or margins far above peers can all signal manipulation.
Example: Revenue rises 25% while receivables rise 70%. Days sales outstanding jumps from 45 to 61 days, and operating cash flow falls despite record profit. These patterns are consistent with revenue recorded before it is earned, such as channel stuffing or fictitious sales. The next step is testing year-end sales, credit notes after year end and customer confirmations.
COSO and Fraud Prevention
COSO's 2013 framework includes a principle that the organization considers the potential for fraud in assessing risks. A strong control environment, independent audit committee and effective whistleblowing channel all reduce the opportunity for management fraud.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Fraud case analysis | Identifying the scheme and red flags | Show the accounts affected and the evidence of manipulation |
| Ratio and trend analysis | Detecting anomalies | Compare over time and with peers, then explain outliers |
| COSO evaluation | Assessing controls | Use the five components to structure findings |
| Prevention plan | Designing safeguards | Link each measure to a specific fraud risk |
Governance and the Tone at the Top
Because management fraud often involves people who can override controls, governance is a central defense. An independent audit committee that oversees financial reporting, meets the external and internal auditors without management present and takes whistleblower reports seriously makes manipulation harder to sustain.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act strengthened these structures for US public companies, including audit committee independence and officer certification of financial reports.
Prevention also depends on culture. Unrealistic targets tied heavily to bonuses create pressure; a code of conduct that leaders visibly follow, and confidential reporting channels employees trust, reduce rationalization and increase the chance of early detection.
In an ACC-691 prevention plan, combine governance measures with specific controls. For a revenue scheme, that might mean independent review of large year-end contracts, monthly reconciliation of sales to shipping records and audit committee review of unusual revenue trends, together with a clear, protected route for staff to raise concerns.
Where Students Get Stuck
- Ratios without interpretation. Say what each anomaly could mean and how you would test it.
- Generic controls. Tie each recommendation to the scheme in the case.
- Ignoring management override. Senior people can bypass controls; governance and oversight matter.
- Stating conclusions as fact. Present red flags and evidence, not accusations.
Study Tips for ACC-691
- Keep a list of key ratios with the fraud schemes each can reveal.
- Learn the five COSO components and the fraud risk principle.
- Study well-known public cases to see how schemes were concealed and uncovered.
- Note overlaps with the CFE exam if you plan to sit it.
How We Help with ACC-691
Send the case, financial statements, rubric and feedback. A writer with forensic accounting knowledge can prepare a worked analysis, explain detection techniques and COSO, or review your draft. See our accounting assignment help guide for other modules.
GradeEssays is independent of Southern New Hampshire University. Our models are study aids: use them to understand the reasoning, then complete and submit your own work under SNHU's academic integrity policy. All work is written from scratch with free revisions within the scope of your original request.
Build a Sharper ACC-691 Analysis
Share the case, statements and feedback. We prepare a worked model you can study and compare.
Start My ACC-691 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
SNHU describes deeper study of fraud detection and prevention, risk assessment, the COSO internal control framework, and relevant laws, regulations and ethics.
Yes. It is the second of four courses in SNHU's graduate forensic accounting and fraud examination certificate.
SNHU states that it covers content included in the CFE exam.
A widely used internal control framework with five components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring.
Revenue outpacing cash flow, rising receivables, unusual year-end entries and margins far above peers.
Yes. Send the case and rubric; we prepare a model or review your draft.