Capella University

PSY8770: Psychology of Motivation and Performance

A guide to Capella's advanced graduate course on motivation theory, performance, satisfaction and performance-enhancement models.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

PSY8770 is an advanced course in which students explore psychological theories, concepts and principles of motivation. Capella's catalog says they evaluate the factors of motivation that influence personal and professional performance, success and satisfaction.

Students also synthesize research to identify, assess and integrate motivational strategies, and apply models of performance enhancement. At this level, the focus moves from describing theories to comparing them, judging the evidence and integrating several sources into a coherent argument.

Course at a Glance

ItemDetails
UniversityCapella University
Course codePSY8770
Credits (catalog)5
Level8000-level course
Subject areaMotivation and performance
Typical workResearch synthesis and application of performance models

What PSY8770 Covers

Strand (from the catalog)What it involves
Theories, concepts and principles of motivationComparing major accounts of why people act
Factors influencing performancePersonal and professional influences on success
SatisfactionHow motivation relates to satisfaction
Research synthesisIdentifying, assessing and integrating strategies from the literature
Performance-enhancement modelsApplying models to real cases

Key Ideas Worth Mastering

Synthesis, Not Summary

Synthesis means organizing sources by idea rather than by author, and showing where they agree, differ or build on one another. A synthesis paragraph states a claim and draws on several sources.

Example (invented structure): "Across the studies reviewed, goal specificity was linked to performance (Source A, Source B), although Source C found that the effect weakened when tasks were complex. This suggests that strategy choice depends on task type." The point comes first, and the sources support it.

Comparing Theories

At graduate level you compare theories on assumptions, evidence and practical use. A comparison matrix helps you see where theories complement rather than compete.

Integrating Strategies

The catalog speaks of integrating motivational strategies. Combine strategies into a plan that fits a specific person, team or setting, and explain why the combination suits it.

Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them

Check your course materials for the exact assignments, since formats vary. The table lists typical advanced-level tasks.

Task typeWhat it testsHow to approach it
Literature synthesisIntegrating researchOrganize by theme and state what the body of work shows
Theory comparisonCritical evaluationUse criteria such as evidence, scope and application
Performance model applicationUsing models in practiceApply a model to a defined case and discuss limits

A Synthesis Matrix

A matrix keeps a large reading list manageable.

Source and theoryFindingLimit
Author, year, theory nameOne sentenceSample and method limits

Add one row per source, then read down the columns to see themes and gaps before you write.

A Worked Comparison

Graduate comparisons work best with explicit criteria. The structure below is an invented outline, and the theories should be replaced with those in your own materials.

Criteria: assumptions about what drives behavior, strength of evidence, scope of application, practical use. Theory A: strong support in controlled studies, narrower in real workplaces. Theory B: broader scope, more mixed evidence. Conclusion: the choice depends on whether the goal is explanation or intervention design, and the two can be combined, with the combination justified by the evidence on each part.

Writing at Graduate Level

Lead with your argument, support it with synthesized evidence, and be explicit about limits. Avoid listing studies; instead group them under claims.

Use hedged but definite language, such as "the evidence suggests" with a clear reason. Check the rubric for how critical analysis, integration and APA style are weighted, and make sure each has a visible place in the paper.

Before You Submit

Measure the draft against the rubric one more time, noting where each criterion is visibly met.

Pacing the Course

Graduate courses reward steady reading. Read, annotate and add to your synthesis matrix in the same session so nothing piles up. Draft the thesis for each paper early, then use the matrix to test whether the evidence supports it. Reserve final time for editing for argument and APA, which together often account for much of a rubric.

Where Students Get Stuck

Study Tips for PSY8770

How We Help with PSY8770

Send the assignment prompt, rubric and your sources. A writer with a psychology background can explain a theory, prepare a referenced model synthesis, or review your draft for argument, evidence and APA style. See our APA research paper help guide for wider support.

GradeEssays is independent of Capella University. Our work is tutoring and reference material for use within Capella's academic integrity policy, and we cannot guarantee any grade or rating. Orders are written from scratch, with free revisions within the scope of your original request and a full refund if late.

Strengthen Your PSY8770 Synthesis

Share the assignment and your draft. A tutor prepares a custom response or reviews your work against the criteria.

Start My PSY8770 Help

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

How many credits is PSY8770?

The catalog lists 5 credits.

What does the course cover?

Motivation theories, factors affecting performance and satisfaction, research synthesis and performance-enhancement models.

What level is it?

It is an 8000-level course in Capella's catalog.

What is research synthesis?

Combining findings from several sources into a coherent argument organized by theme.

Is there a FlexPath version?

The catalog lists PSY8770 under Capella's psychology courses. This page does not claim a separate FlexPath version.

What should I send for help?

The prompt, rubric, your sources and any instructor feedback.