Home / Courses / PSY5280
Capella University — Applied Behavior Analysis

PSY5280: Advanced Concepts in Applied Behavior Analysis

A complete guide to Capella's PSY5280. Building on foundational principles, this course examines advanced behavioral concepts that underpin sophisticated clinical and educational practice — stimulus control and discrimination training, motivating operations, rule-governed behavior, behavioral momentum, complex reinforcement schedules, behavior skills training (BST), shaping and chaining, and the design of comprehensive behavior support plans (BSPs).

Master's Level4 Quarter CreditsABA SpecializationBACB Task List

PSY5280 moves ABA students from understanding basic principles to applying advanced concepts in designing effective, individualized behavior support. These concepts — stimulus control, motivating operations, rule-governed behavior, BST — are not abstract theory; they are the technical tools that distinguish a BCBA's thinking from an untrained practitioner's intuition.

Stimulus control and discrimination training

Stimulus control exists when a behavior occurs more reliably in the presence of a specific stimulus (the discriminative stimulus, SD) than in its absence. Discrimination training — differentially reinforcing behavior in the presence of SD and not reinforcing (or reinforcing on an extinction schedule) in the presence of S-Delta (S∆, the "not-SD") — produces stimulus control. Stimulus generalization (responding to stimuli similar to the SD) and stimulus discrimination (differentiating between stimuli) are both clinically important: appropriate generalization (skills transferring from training to natural settings) is desired, while overgeneralization (responding to incorrect stimuli) must be reduced. Errorless learning procedures (Terrace, 1963) — most-to-least prompt fading, progressive delay, stimulus shaping — minimize error responses during acquisition and are particularly important for learners with developmental disabilities.

Motivating operations (MOs)

The motivating operation (MO) concept, refined by Jack Michael, refers to environmental events or conditions that: (1) alter the reinforcing or punishing effectiveness of a stimulus (the value-altering effect), and (2) alter the frequency of behavior that has previously produced that stimulus (the behavior-altering effect). Establishing operations (EOs) increase the effectiveness of a stimulus as reinforcer and increase the relevant behavior — food deprivation is an EO for food as reinforcer and for food-seeking behavior. Abolishing operations (AOs) decrease reinforcer effectiveness and decrease the relevant behavior — satiation is an AO. In clinical ABA, MOs are essential for FBA because problem behavior often occurs under specific motivational conditions (a tantrum when preferred activities are withheld is motivated by an AO for demands and an EO for escaping). Understanding MOs allows practitioners to both conduct more accurate functional analyses and design interventions that manipulate antecedent conditions.

Rule-governed behavior

Rule-governed behavior (Skinner, 1969; Cerutti, 1989) refers to behavior controlled by verbal descriptions of contingencies, rather than by direct contact with those contingencies. A rule ("If you complete your homework, you may watch TV") functions as an antecedent stimulus that controls behavior even before the individual has experienced the actual contingency. Rule-governed behavior is critical for understanding how humans respond to instructions, laws, social norms, and long-delayed consequences (retirement savings, health behavior) without requiring direct experience of each contingency. The PSY5280 coverage of rule-governed behavior bridges to Relational Frame Theory (RFT) — the behavioral account of human language and cognition — and to its clinical application in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

Key advanced topics in PSY5280

PSY5280 assignments include BIP development, shaping program design, and BST training protocol papers

Our ABA specialists write BACB Task List-aligned, clinically accurate academic support for every advanced ABA assignment.

Get Expert Help

Get Help With PSY5280

Behavior intervention plans, shaping programs, task analyses, BST protocols, MO analysis, token economy design.

Place Your OrderView All Services

Related courses

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a motivating operation and a discriminative stimulus?

Both motivating operations (MOs) and discriminative stimuli (SDs) influence behavior as antecedents, but they do so through fundamentally different mechanisms. An SD signals that reinforcement IS available — its presence increases the probability of a behavior because the behavior has been reinforced in the presence of that stimulus in the past. The SD's effect is immediate and its function is signaling (evocative). An MO, in contrast, changes the reinforcing VALUE of a stimulus — it doesn't signal availability, it changes what the organism currently "wants" or needs. Food deprivation is an MO for food — it doesn't signal that food is present or available (that's what the smell of food does — an SD); it makes food more valuable as a reinforcer and makes food-seeking behavior more probable regardless of immediate food-associated stimuli. In practice: a child who always sits when the teacher holds up the "sit down" card — the card is an SD. That same child who is particularly disruptive right before lunch — hunger (food deprivation) is an MO making escape from demands less reinforcing than usual and access to food more reinforcing. BCBAs must assess both SDs and MOs when designing interventions — antecedent-based strategies often target MOs (providing frequent access to reinforcement to reduce deprivation MOs for attention; pre-task organization to reduce demand aversion).