Home / Courses / PSY5135
Capella University — Counseling Psychology

PSY5135: Issues and Trends in Addiction-Related Treatments

A complete guide to Capella's PSY5135. Covering addiction from neuroscience to policy, this course examines the current state of addiction treatment — the brain disease model, DSM-5 substance use disorder classification, the full spectrum of evidence-based treatments (motivational interviewing, CBT, contingency management, 12-step facilitation, medication-assisted treatment), harm reduction, co-occurring disorders, and emerging issues including the opioid epidemic and behavioral addictions.

Master's Level4 Quarter CreditsAddiction CounselingEvidence-Based Practice

Substance use disorders and behavioral addictions affect tens of millions of people in the United States, creating enormous individual, family, and societal burden. PSY5135 prepares mental health practitioners to understand addiction comprehensively — its neurobiological underpinnings, its psychological and social dimensions, and the full range of evidence-based treatments — while navigating the ongoing debates in the field about disease models, harm reduction, and abstinence-only approaches.

Understanding addiction: brain disease model and beyond

The dominant scientific framework in addiction medicine is the brain disease model of addiction (BDMA), most prominently articulated by Alan Leshner (1997) and Nora Volkow (NIDA director). The BDMA holds that repeated substance use causes lasting neurobiological changes in the brain's reward circuitry — particularly the mesolimbic dopamine system — that impair impulse control, alter motivational priorities, and produce compulsive drug-seeking behavior that persists even when the person wants to stop. Key neurobiological concepts include: dopaminergic reward prediction error (Schultz, 1997); sensitization of drug-craving circuits (Robinson & Berridge incentive salience); and prefrontal cortical hypoactivation reducing executive control over behavior (Goldstein & Volkow, 2002).

The BDMA has been critiqued for overstating inevitability (most people with SUDs recover, many without treatment), for potentially reducing autonomy and moral agency, and for potentially increasing stigma (paradoxically) if a "brain disease" label implies permanent damage. PSY5135 examines these critiques — including the social learning perspective (SUDs as learned behaviors amenable to re-learning) and the biopsychosocial model — while acknowledging the significant neuroscientific evidence supporting the BDMA for understanding severe, chronic SUDs.

DSM-5 substance use disorder classification

The DSM-5 (2013) replaced the DSM-IV's separate "abuse" and "dependence" categories with a single Substance Use Disorder (SUD) diagnosis with a severity specifier: mild (2–3 criteria), moderate (4–5), or severe (6+) of 11 criteria organized in four domains: (1) Impaired control — taking more or longer than intended, unsuccessful efforts to cut down, spending great time obtaining/using/recovering, craving; (2) Social impairment — failure to fulfill major role obligations, continued use despite interpersonal problems, giving up activities; (3) Risky use — use in physically hazardous situations, continued use despite knowledge of a physical/psychological problem caused by use; (4) Pharmacological criteria — tolerance (diminished effect with same dose or need for larger dose to achieve effect) and withdrawal (syndrome upon cessation or reduction). Notably, legal problems was removed as a criterion (too culturally variable), and craving was added. Gambling Disorder was moved into the Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders chapter as the first recognized behavioral addiction.

Evidence-based treatment approaches

The treatment spectrum — from engagement to maintenance

  • Motivational Interviewing (MI — Miller & Rollnick, 1991/2002/2013): A person-centered, directive counseling style for eliciting and strengthening motivation for change. Four core processes: Engage, Focus, Evoke (change talk), Plan. Core skills: OARS (Open questions, Affirmations, Reflections, Summaries). MI Spirit: Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion, Evocation. Empirically supported across hundreds of randomized trials; particularly effective for ambivalence and engagement. The transtheoretical model (Prochaska & DiClemente) stages of change (precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, termination) provides a useful conceptual partner to MI.
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for SUDs (CBT-SUD): Functional analysis of substance use (triggers, thoughts, feelings, behaviors, consequences); coping skills training for high-risk situations (urge surfing, cognitive restructuring of substance-related beliefs, communication skills, relapse prevention planning); Marlatt & Gordon's Relapse Prevention model (apparently irrelevant decisions, high-risk situations, abstinence violation effect). Strong evidence base; effective delivered individually, in groups, and via computerized/digital formats.
  • Contingency Management (CM): Systematic use of tangible reinforcers (vouchers, prizes) contingent on objectively verified abstinence (urine drug screen negative). Fishbowl/prize CM (Petry) and voucher-based reinforcement (Higgins) have among the strongest effect sizes in addiction research. Particularly effective for stimulant (cocaine, methamphetamine) and opioid use disorders — conditions where pharmacotherapy options are limited.
  • 12-Step Facilitation (TSF): Structured approach to engaging clients with AA/NA/CA; acceptance of Step 1 (powerlessness over substance) and spiritual/higher power framework; active attendance, sponsorship, and step work. Project MATCH (1997) found TSF equivalently effective to CBT and MET in a large RCT, with specific advantages for patients with high anger or social networks supportive of drinking.
  • Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) / Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD): Methadone (opioid agonist — reduces craving and withdrawal, dispensed in licensed OTPs), buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone — partial agonist, office-based, less regulatory burden), naltrexone (extended-release injection Vivitrol — opioid antagonist, blocks euphoria, no abuse potential). For alcohol: naltrexone (reduces craving and relapse rates), acamprosate (reduces protracted withdrawal), disulfiram (aversion). For nicotine: nicotine replacement therapies, varenicline (Chantix), bupropion. MAT significantly reduces mortality, disease transmission, and criminal justice involvement — the evidence base is overwhelming despite political and 12-step community resistance.
  • Harm reduction: Pragmatic public health approaches prioritizing safer use over abstinence when abstinence is not the client's immediate goal — needle/syringe exchange programs, naloxone distribution, fentanyl test strips, supervised consumption sites, safer-use education. Rooted in a value of reducing drug-related harm without requiring abstinence first. Philosophically controversial in abstinence-only settings but strongly evidence-supported for reducing HIV/hepatitis C transmission and overdose mortality.

Co-occurring disorders (CODs)

At least 50% of individuals with substance use disorders have a co-occurring mental health disorder (SAMHSA, 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health). Common co-occurrences include: depression (both sharing neurobiological pathways), anxiety disorders (particularly PTSD — the self-medication hypothesis), ADHD, bipolar disorder, and antisocial/borderline personality disorders. Integrated dual diagnosis treatment (simultaneous rather than sequential treatment of both disorders in the same setting) is the evidence-based best practice (Drake et al., 2004), replacing the older sequential model ("treat the addiction first, then the mental health issue").

PSY5135 assignments include treatment comparison papers, case conceptualizations, and policy analyses on addiction trends

Our specialists provide evidence-based, SAMHSA-aligned academic support for addiction treatment coursework.

Get Expert Help

Get Help With PSY5135

Addiction treatment comparison papers, MI analysis, MAT policy papers, co-occurring disorder case studies.

Place Your OrderView All Services

Related courses

Frequently asked questions

What are the current trends in addiction treatment being addressed in PSY5135?

The opioid epidemic remains the defining addiction crisis of the current era: over 80,000 opioid-related overdose deaths in 2021 (CDC), driven increasingly by illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogs. This has accelerated expansion of MOUD (particularly buprenorphine, which can now be prescribed by waiver-eligible providers in primary care settings following removal of the DATA 2000 X-waiver requirement in January 2023), naloxone distribution and access (now available over-the-counter as of 2023), and harm reduction infrastructure. Telehealth expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically increased access to addiction treatment, with evidence suggesting equivalent outcomes for some populations — telehealth prescribing of buprenorphine without in-person visit requirements was significantly expanded and retained post-pandemic. Cannabis policy changes (legalization in many states) complicate clinical practice — cannabis use disorder is real and recognized in DSM-5, but many clients present with medical cannabis use and the evidence on harm varies significantly. Gambling disorder (recognized in DSM-5), internet gaming disorder, and discussions about food addiction and compulsive sexual behavior represent the frontier of behavioral addiction science that PSY5135 examines.