Capella University

ED8370: Nursing Leadership and Professional Practice

A study guide to Capella's ED8370, a doctoral course on the grants process within nursing leadership, from identifying needs to writing proposal elements.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

ED8370 at Capella University has students explore the grants process within the context of nursing leadership.

According to the catalog, they develop skills to identify needs and grant opportunities, cultivate organizational and professional support for grant activities, critique grant proposals, and write elements of a proposal.

It is a late course in the sequence, with ED8355 and ED8365 as prerequisites. Many students find grant writing a new genre: it is persuasive but must remain precise, and every claim about need, plan and outcome has to connect.

Course at a Glance

ItemDetails
UniversityCapella University
Course codeED8370
Credits4 (per the 2025-2026 catalog)
PrerequisitesED8355 and ED8365
Subject areaGrants and leadership in nursing education
TransferCannot be fulfilled by transfer
Typical workNeeds identification, proposal critique, writing proposal elements (per the catalog)

What ED8370 Covers

Skill (per the catalog)What it involves
Identify specific needsEvidence of a problem the grant would address
Identify grant opportunitiesMatching your project to funders' priorities
Cultivate supportGaining backing from your organization and colleagues
Critique proposalsJudging strengths and weaknesses of examples
Write proposal elementsDrafting parts such as a needs statement or objectives

Key Concepts Explained

The Anatomy of a Proposal

Funders differ, but most proposals include a statement of need, goals and measurable objectives, a plan of activities, an evaluation plan, a budget with justification, and a statement of capacity or sustainability. Always follow the funder's own guidelines over any general template.

Objectives That Can Be Measured

Objectives state who will change, by how much, and by when. Vague aims such as "improve education" cannot be evaluated.

Illustrative example: Weak: "Improve simulation experience." Stronger: "By the end of the second semester, 90% of participating students will complete a post-simulation debrief using a structured tool, and faculty will report their confidence in debriefing on a baseline and follow-up survey." The second can be counted and checked.

Logic and Alignment

A logic model links inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. If a need is described, an objective addresses it, an activity delivers it and an evaluation measures it, reviewers can follow the thread.

Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them

Assignment typeWhat it testsHow to approach it
Funding searchIdentifying fitCompare funder priorities with your project
Proposal critiqueEvaluative judgmentUse funder criteria or a rubric to structure comments
Needs statementEvidence-based persuasionUse data and cite sources for each claim
Objectives and evaluationClear, measurable planningWrite SMART-style objectives and matching measures

Budget and Justification Basics

A budget is an argument in numbers. Each line should connect to an activity and be explained in plain terms.

Budget categoryTypical justification
PersonnelRoles needed to deliver the activities, with time commitments
Equipment and suppliesItems required, with the reason each is necessary
TrainingSkills participants need to carry out the plan
EvaluationCosts of collecting and analyzing outcome data

Check whether the funder allows each category. Funders often restrict costs, so reading the guidelines closely avoids a budget that cannot be accepted.

Building Organizational Support

The catalog lists cultivating organizational and professional support, so expect to write about people as well as paperwork. Funders look for evidence that a project will be backed once the money arrives.

Source of supportHow to show it
LeadershipLetter of support committing time or resources
PartnersDescribed roles in the plan
Users or beneficiariesEvidence of demand, such as survey results
Finance or grants officeConfirmation that the budget meets institutional rules

Think about sustainability as well. Reviewers ask what happens when the grant ends, so describe how the work will continue, for instance through adoption into regular budgets or curriculum.

Checking Your Draft Before Submission

Where Students Get Stuck

Study Tips for ED8370

How We Help with ED8370

Send the prompt, rubric, any funder guidance and your draft. A writer can prepare a custom proposal element, explain how the parts align, or edit your work. For wider proposal support see our grant proposal writing help guide.

GradeEssays is independent of Capella University. Our work is a study aid; you complete and submit your own work under Capella's academic integrity policy. Orders include free revisions within the scope of your original request and a full refund if late. We never promise that a proposal will be funded.

Strengthen Your ED8370 Proposal Writing

Share your assignment and draft. We prepare a model section or edit your work for clarity and alignment.

Start My ED8370 Help

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the prerequisites for ED8370?

ED8355 and ED8365, per the catalog.

Does the course involve writing a full grant?

The catalog says students critique proposals and write elements of a proposal.

Will I need to find real funders?

The catalog lists identifying grant opportunities, so expect to search for them.

What makes a good objective?

It is specific, measurable and time-bound, and linked to the need.

How many credits?

Four, per the catalog.

Will you complete my assessments?

No. We provide custom answers, feedback and editing as study support.