DB9801 is the proposal course in Capella University's Doctor of Business Administration.
The catalog says students select their project method, data analysis technique, scholarly framework and participant pool, then use earlier learning, artifacts and tools to create an individualized project proposal with a data collection plan and an Institutional Review Board (IRB) screening form.
They also conduct tests and reviews of their data collection instruments. The course is graded satisfactory or not satisfactory (S/NS), so the focus is on meeting the required standard rather than on a letter grade.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Capella University |
| Code and title | DB9801 Proposal Writing |
| Credits | 6 (quarter credits) |
| Prerequisite | DB8650, DB8750 or DB8850 |
| Grading | S/NS |
| Transfer | Cannot be fulfilled by transfer |
What DB9801 Covers
| Element | What it involves |
|---|---|
| Project method | Choosing a design that fits the research question |
| Data analysis technique | Selecting how the data will be analyzed and why |
| Scholarly framework | Carrying forward the theory or model grounding the project |
| Participant pool | Who you will recruit or which data sources you will use |
| Data collection plan | Steps, instruments, timing and storage |
| IRB screening form | Showing the project meets ethical review requirements |
| Instrument testing and review | Checking that questions or tools work as intended |
Key Ideas Explained
Alignment Between Question, Method and Analysis
The most common reason proposals are returned is a mismatch. The question, method, instrument and analysis must fit like a chain.
Illustrative example: If the question asks how managers experience a change, interviews with thematic analysis fit. If the question asks whether two measures are related, a survey with a statistical test fits. Mixing the two without a reason creates confusion.
Participants and Access
State who qualifies, how many you plan to include, how you will reach them and what protections apply. Reviewers want a realistic plan, not an ideal one.
Ethical Screening
The IRB screening form asks you to describe risks, consent and data handling. Answer plainly and consistently with the proposal text.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Proposal sections | Method, analysis and framework clarity | Follow the template headings and justify each choice |
| Data collection plan | Practical, ethical planning | Detail steps, timing, consent and storage |
| IRB screening form | Ethics awareness | Make answers match the proposal exactly |
| Instrument review | Quality of questions or tools | Test with a small review and record changes |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Mismatched design. Check every section against the research question.
- Vague participant criteria. Give inclusion and exclusion rules.
- Inconsistent forms. The IRB form must agree with the proposal.
- Untested instruments. Record how you tested and revised them.
Planning Your Term
| Stage | Do this | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Start | Review your approved topic and literature | One-page design summary |
| Design | Fix method, analysis, participants | Draft proposal sections |
| Ethics | Complete the screening form | Form consistent with proposal |
| Instruments | Test and refine | Revision notes |
| Submit | Check alignment and APA | Final proposal |
Checking Alignment: A Worked Chain
Alignment is the main quality test for a proposal. This illustrative chain shows how one idea carries through every section; yours will differ, but the checking method is the same.
| Section | Illustrative content |
|---|---|
| Problem | Managers in mid-sized firms report slow adoption of a new reporting process |
| Research question | How do managers describe the barriers to adopting the process? |
| Method | Qualitative design using semi-structured interviews |
| Participants | Managers with at least one year of experience using the process |
| Instrument | Interview guide tested with a small review group |
| Analysis | Thematic analysis of transcripts |
| IRB form | Consent, confidentiality and storage described to match the above |
Read down the right-hand column. Every row should make sense given the row above. If the question asked "how many" but the method is interviews, or if the participants described on the IRB form differ from the proposal, the chain is broken.
Sample size and saturation deserve a short, honest paragraph. Say how many participants or records you plan to include and why that number fits your design, and avoid promising a figure you cannot justify. Reviewers usually prefer a reasoned range to an arbitrary number.
Finally, give your instrument a clear audit trail. Record who reviewed it, what they said and what you changed. The catalog mentions testing and reviewing data collection instruments, and a short table of changes is easy evidence that you did.
Common Reviewer Questions
- Why is this method suited to the research question?
- How will participants be identified, and who is excluded?
- How were instruments tested, and what changed?
- Does the IRB screening form match the proposal in every detail?
Answering these in your draft before anyone asks usually saves a revision round.
Study Tips for DB9801
- Create an alignment table with columns for question, method, instrument, analysis.
- Write the IRB answers from your proposal, not from memory.
- Test instruments with a few people outside your sample.
- Keep all version history; reviewers sometimes ask what changed.
How We Help with DB9801
Send your template, rubric, drafts and feedback. We can prepare a custom proposal outline, check alignment, or edit for clarity and APA. See our dissertation proposal help guide for the wider process.
GradeEssays is independent of Capella University. Our work is a study and reference aid; you complete and submit your own work under Capella's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch, include free revisions within the scope of your original request, and are refunded in full if late.
Get Your Project Proposal in Order
Share your draft and reviewer notes. A writer experienced in business research edits for alignment and clarity, or prepares a model to study.
Start My DB9801 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
DB8650, DB8750 or DB8850.
The catalog says satisfactory or not satisfactory (S/NS).
Six quarter credits.
An individualized project proposal with a data collection plan and an IRB screening form.
DB9802 Data Analysis Practice and IRB Approval.
No.