DB8750 is the literature review seminar for students in the strategy and innovation specialization at Capella University.
According to the catalog, students write synthetic reviews of the literature supporting their topic, their planned technique for collecting data, and the framework, theory, concept or model that grounds their project.
The review is graded and also reviewed by multiple approvers: the catalog says capstone literature review approval is required to move beyond the course. That makes it a high-stakes document that is easy to under-plan.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Capella University |
| Code and title | DB8750 Seminar: Strategy and Innovation Literature Review |
| Credits | 6 (quarter credits) |
| Prerequisite | DB8740 |
| Transfer | Cannot be fulfilled by transfer |
| Key requirement | Literature review approval from multiple approvers |
What DB8750 Covers
The catalog describes three strands that the review must support:
| Strand | What the review should show |
|---|---|
| Your topic | What is known about the problem and what is still missing |
| Data collection technique | Why the technique you plan suits this kind of question |
| Framework, theory, concept or model | How the scholarly lens grounds the project |
Key Ideas Explained
Synthesis Versus Summary
A synthetic review organizes sources by idea. Each paragraph makes a claim, supports it with several sources, and notes where they agree or differ.
Illustrative example: Instead of "Smith (2019) found X. Jones (2020) found Y.", write "Studies report that X is associated with Y (Smith, 2019; Jones, 2020), although results differ in smaller firms, which this project addresses."
Search Strategy
Record the databases, search terms and date limits you used. A transparent search makes your review easier to defend and to update later.
Structure by Theme
Typical themes are topic, framework and method. Short introductions and summaries at the start and end of each theme keep the reader oriented.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Literature review drafts | Synthesis and coverage | Write theme by theme and cite several sources per claim |
| Source matrix or search log | Rigor of search | Record each search and each source's key points |
| Revisions after review | Responding to feedback | Use a comment-by-comment response table |
Where Students Get Stuck
- List-like reviews. Reorganize by theme if each paragraph begins with an author name.
- Dated sources. Balance foundational works with recent studies.
- Gaps not stated. End each theme with what remains unknown.
- Citation errors. Check that every in-text citation appears in the reference list.
Planning Your Term
| Stage | Do this | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Start | Outline themes | Heading structure |
| Searching | Run and log searches | Source matrix |
| Drafting | Write theme by theme | Full first draft |
| Review | Edit for synthesis and APA | Submission draft |
Approval timelines are set by Capella, so build in time for at least one round of revisions.
Building the Review: A Sample Outline
Students often ask how long each part should be. Your template and rubric decide that, but the outline below shows a reasonable order for a review covering the three strands in the catalog.
| Part | Purpose | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Orient the reader | The problem, the search method and how the review is organized |
| Topic literature | Show what is known | Themes in studies on the problem, with conflicts and gaps |
| Framework literature | Ground the project | Origins of the theory or model, how others have applied it, criticisms |
| Method literature | Justify data collection | How similar studies collected data, and strengths and limits of the technique |
| Summary and gap | Link to your project | What the literature leaves open and how your project responds |
Within each part, keep paragraphs to one idea. A typical paragraph states a claim, gives two or three supporting sources, notes any disagreement, and ends with a link back to your project.
Finish with a reference check. Count the in-text citations against the reference list, confirm years and spellings, and make sure every source you describe is one you actually read. Mismatches are among the easiest comments for an approver to make and the easiest for you to prevent.
Paragraph Check
Read the first sentence of each paragraph in order. They should outline your argument. If they read as a list of authors, regroup by idea and lead with the claim instead.
Common Writing Problems and Fixes
| Problem | Why reviewers flag it | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Long quotations | Shows less of your own analysis | Paraphrase and cite; quote only key phrases |
| Unexplained terms | Reader cannot follow the argument | Define once with a source |
| Missing method sources | Technique looks arbitrary | Cite studies that used and critiqued it |
Study Tips for DB8750
- Write the topic sentence of each paragraph before filling in evidence.
- Read limitations sections: they point to gaps worth citing.
- Reuse your approved topic wording so the review stays aligned.
- Run a reference check before every submission.
How We Help with DB8750
Send your outline, template, drafts and feedback. We can prepare a custom review, check your synthesis and structure, or edit for clarity and APA 7 formatting. See our literature review help guide for more.
GradeEssays is independent of Capella University. Our work is a study and reference aid; you complete and submit your own work under Capella's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch, include free revisions within the scope of your original request, and are refunded in full if late.
Get Your Literature Review in Shape
Share your draft and approver comments. A research writer edits for synthesis and APA, or prepares a model to study.
Start My DB8750 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
DB8740.
Six quarter credits.
Capstone literature review approval from multiple approvers to move beyond the course.
Your topic, planned data collection technique and the framework, theory, concept or model grounding the project.
No.
DB9801 Proposal Writing lists DB8650, DB8750 or DB8850 as a prerequisite.