High performance leadership is not simply leadership that produces good results in the short term — it is leadership that builds the organizational capabilities, team dynamics, and cultural conditions that enable sustained excellence across multiple performance cycles, changing environments, and leadership transitions. DB8620 examines the scholarly literature on what distinguishes high-performance leaders and organizations, and develops the analytical and practical competencies to apply this research to organizational leadership challenges.
High performance team development
What the research says about building teams that consistently excel
- Team effectiveness research foundations: DB8620 examines the extensive research on team effectiveness — what factors predict whether teams consistently outperform their individual members (process gains) or consistently underperform them (process losses). Hackman's (1990, 2002) research on team effectiveness identifies several necessary conditions: a real team with clear membership and stable composition; a compelling direction that provides purpose and motivates full engagement; an enabling team structure (including appropriate norms, team composition with sufficient diversity of relevant skills, and reasonable team size — research suggests 5-7 members as roughly optimal for most complex tasks); a supportive organizational context (adequate material resources, information access, rewards that reinforce team performance, and HR systems that develop individual skills); and competent team coaching at key moments in the team's performance cycle. The Google Project Aristotle research (2016) found that psychological safety — the shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking, that members can express ideas and concerns without fear of punishment or humiliation — was the single most important predictor of team effectiveness across the 180 Google teams studied, outweighing specific team composition and structural characteristics
- Team leadership practices for high performance: The course examines what leaders specifically do to build and maintain high-performing teams. Research on team coaching (Hackman & Wageman, 2005) identifies three functions that are most needed at different stages of the team performance cycle: motivational coaching (before work begins — establishing team purpose and commitment to excellence); consultative coaching (mid-cycle — developing collective strategy and skill); and educational coaching (after completion — facilitating learning from experience). The course also examines how leaders manage team boundary-spanning (managing the team's relationships with external stakeholders and resource providers — the "ambassador" role that leaders play on behalf of their teams); psychological safety creation (leader behaviors that signal that mistakes are learning opportunities, that dissent is welcomed, and that the purpose of evaluation is improvement rather than judgment); and team diversity management (leveraging the innovation benefits of diverse teams while managing the process losses — slower decision making, higher conflict — that diversity can also produce)
Reskilling management through HR frameworks
DB8620 examines reskilling and leadership development as intertwined challenges in high-performance organizations. As the technical and leadership demands on managers change faster than traditional development programs can address them, organizations face a reskilling imperative that goes beyond training in new technical skills — it requires fundamentally changing how managers think about their roles, how they relate to their teams, and how they make decisions in contexts of increasing complexity and uncertainty. The course examines HR frameworks for reskilling leadership: competency model development (identifying the leadership competencies that the organization's strategy requires and that current managers lack); needs assessment (distinguishing performance gaps that reflect skill deficits from those that reflect motivation, environment, or system factors — a critical distinction, since training is rarely the right solution for non-skill problems); leadership development program design (the evidence on which development modalities are most effective — 70/20/10 frameworks that emphasize on-the-job developmental experiences over formal training; action learning approaches that develop leadership through working on real organizational challenges; developmental job assignments that stretch managers beyond their current capabilities); and the transfer of training challenge (ensuring that skills developed in formal development programs are actually applied on the job, which research suggests is the primary failure point of most leadership development initiatives).
Values, practices, and high-impact leadership
DB8620 examines the values and practices that distinguish high-impact leaders — those whose leadership produces sustained organizational performance, follower development, and positive cultural change — from technically competent managers who do not have transformational impact. The research literature identifies several characteristics of high-impact leaders. Strong personal values alignment: high-impact leaders have articulated, internalized values that guide their decisions consistently — and followers perceive this consistency as authenticity, which research associates with higher trust, commitment, and willingness to follow in uncertain situations. Long-term orientation: high-impact leaders invest in building organizational capabilities and culture that outlast their own tenure, rather than optimizing for short-term metrics that create the appearance of success at the expense of organizational health. Talent orientation: high-impact leaders systematically identify, develop, and promote talent — research on high-performing organizations consistently shows that building the next generation of leaders is a defining characteristic of sustained organizational excellence, not an afterthought to business performance. Learning orientation: high-impact leaders model intellectual curiosity and learning agility — the willingness to change one's mind, acknowledge mistakes, and continuously update one's mental models in response to evidence and experience. The course examines how these characteristics are developed, maintained under pressure, and sustained across long leadership careers.
Measuring leadership outcomes
DB8620 develops the capacity to define and measure meaningful, measurable leadership outcomes — connecting leadership theory to the evidence of leadership impact that organizations, researchers, and leaders themselves need to evaluate whether leadership development investments are producing intended results. The course examines the multi-level framework for leadership outcomes: follower-level outcomes (job performance, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, psychological well-being, turnover intention); team-level outcomes (team performance, team learning, team cohesion, psychological safety); and organizational-level outcomes (financial performance, innovation output, customer satisfaction, employee engagement surveys, talent retention). The methodological challenges of leadership outcome measurement receive serious attention: the time lag between leadership behavior and organizational outcomes means that current performance reflects decisions made years ago rather than current leader behavior; attribution of organizational performance to specific leaders is challenged by the myriad other factors (industry conditions, competitor behavior, macroeconomic environment, organizational history) that simultaneously affect outcomes; and leaders who take over in distress and create turnarounds will look different from leaders who took over healthy organizations and maintained performance, even if both made similarly skilled decisions. The course examines research designs that enable more credible causal attribution — natural experiments (leadership transitions), longitudinal designs, and multi-level modeling that disentangles leader, team, and organizational variance.
DB8620 assignments include high performance team analyses, leadership development plans, reskilling assessments, and outcome measurement frameworks
Our DBA leadership specialists deliver expert support for DB8620.
Get Help With DB8620
Team effectiveness analyses, leadership development plans, reskilling assessments, outcome measurement frameworks.
Place Your OrderView All ServicesRelated courses
Frequently asked questions
DB8620 examines the organizational performance research that addresses this question — recognizing that distinguishing genuinely superior performance from statistical regression to the mean (the tendency for extreme performers to move toward average over time), luck, and favorable environmental conditions requires rigorous methodology. Jim Collins's Good to Great research (2001) identified several characteristics of companies that sustained superior financial performance for fifteen years: Level 5 leadership (leaders who combine professional will with personal humility — ambitious for the organization rather than for themselves); "first who, then what" talent practices (getting the right people in key roles before deciding strategy); confronting the Brutal Facts while maintaining faith (Stockdale Paradox); a simple Hedgehog Concept (focus on what the organization can be best at); a culture of discipline; and technology as an accelerator, not a driver, of breakthrough performance. The research has been criticized for survivorship bias and for the challenge of distinguishing causation from correlation in a non-experimental design. Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad's core competence framework identifies sustainable competitive advantage in organizational capabilities that are valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate — a theoretical grounding for the HR and learning investments that high-performance organizations make. More recent research (Sull, Turconi, & Sull, 2020) on strategic agility in high-performing organizations emphasizes the capacity to spot opportunities and threats early, make good decisions quickly, and reallocate resources rapidly — pointing to decision-making process and organizational agility as key performance predictors in rapidly changing environments. DB8620 develops the analytical capacity to evaluate this research critically and apply its insights to specific organizational performance challenges.