D591 Grant Writing is a three-unit course in WGU's Bachelor of Science in Public Health, placed in term eight of the standard path.
WGU describes it as introducing the essential tasks and approaches to acquiring funding for public health projects and programs through grants, from both government and non-government sources.
Learners practice researching grants, deciding which align with a program's mission and purpose, evaluating draft proposals and revising key components. It is a practical writing course, and many students find the discipline of matching a proposal precisely to a funder's priorities harder than the writing itself.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Western Governors University |
| Course code | D591 |
| Level | Undergraduate |
| Subject area | Grant seeking and proposal writing |
| Standard path | Term 8 of the BS Public Health guidebook (3 competency units) |
| Typical work | Grant research, proposal component analysis and proposal revision |
What D591 Covers
| Competency (WGU wording, summarized) | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| Researches potential grant opportunities to meet organizational needs | Finding funders and judging fit |
| Describes the components needed in a grant proposal | Knowing what sections a proposal includes and why |
| Revises a grant proposal to appeal to stakeholder values and needs | Editing to match funder priorities and audience |
Key Concepts Explained
Fit Between Need, Program and Funder
A strong proposal starts with alignment. Read a funder's stated priorities and eligibility, then show how your organization's need and program match them. A well-written proposal sent to the wrong funder will still fail.
Typical Proposal Components
Funders usually ask for a need statement, goals and objectives, methods or activities, an evaluation plan, a budget with justification and information about the organization. Always follow the specific funder's instructions, as formats vary.
Illustration (hypothetical): A funder prioritizes youth physical activity. A draft says "improve community health." Revising it to "increase weekly moderate activity among 11 to 14 year olds in two named schools," with an evaluation measure, speaks the funder's language.
Revising for the Reader
Reviewers read many proposals. Clear structure, plain language, concrete numbers and a consistent link between need, activity and outcome make yours easier to score well.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Task type | What it tests | How to approach it |
|---|---|---|
| Grant research | Searching and matching | Compare eligibility, priorities and deadlines |
| Proposal components | Knowledge of structure | Explain the purpose of each section |
| Proposal revision | Editing for impact | Mark changes and explain why each helps the funder |
A Closer Look at Proposal Sections
| Section | Purpose | Common weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Need statement | Shows the problem matters | No local data |
| Goals and objectives | States intended results | Not measurable |
| Methods | Explains what will be done | Not linked to objectives |
| Evaluation | Shows how success is judged | No indicators |
| Budget | Justifies the funds requested | Costs without explanation |
Searching for Grants
Start with the program's purpose, then look for funders whose priorities overlap. Government and non-government sources both appear in the course description. Record eligibility rules, award sizes, deadlines and reporting requirements, since a good match on topic can still fail on eligibility.
Revising a Weak Paragraph
Consider a need statement that reads: "Many people in our town have poor health." Revision would add who, how many, how it is measured and what is missing: "In the town of X, a recent survey found that [your sourced percentage] of adults over 50 reported no routine blood pressure screening in the past year [source, year]." (Replace the bracketed parts with your own sourced figures.) Then connect the need to the funder's priority.
The improved version is specific, measurable and ready to link to an objective. Practicing this kind of revision is the core of the third competency.
Using Real Funding Documents
Practicing on genuine funder guidelines is the quickest way to learn the genre. Read a call for proposals closely and underline the eligibility rules, scoring criteria and page limits. Then compare them with your draft, line by line.
Even when your task uses a case provided in the course, the same habit of reading the funder before writing will show in the quality of your revisions.
Where Students Get Stuck
- Poor funder fit. Use the funder's own wording.
- Vague need statements. Add local data.
- Budget gaps. Every cost should link to an activity.
- Weak evaluation sections. State measures and timing.
Study Tips for D591
- Create a funder fit table: priority, eligibility, deadline, award size.
- Write the one-sentence purpose of each proposal section.
- Edit with the reviewer's scoring in mind.
- Reuse your D584 program plan as source material if it fits.
How We Help with D591
Send the prompt, rubric and any draft. We can prepare a model structure, explain section purposes, or review your revisions. See our grant proposal writing help guide.
GradeEssays is independent and not affiliated with WGU. Our work is a study and reference aid. Your submission must be your own work under WGU's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch, with free revisions within the scope of your original request and a full refund if late.
Strengthen Your Grant Proposal Skills
Share the prompt, rubric and your draft. We prepare a model structure or review your proposal.
Start My D591 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
Researching grants, describing proposal components and revising a proposal to appeal to stakeholders.
Term eight of the BS Public Health standard path.
The competencies emphasize evaluating and revising drafts; check your course of study for what is required.
The description mentions both.
Poor alignment between the proposal and the funder's priorities.
No. We provide tutoring, custom answers, editing and feedback only.