Western Governors University

C225: Research Questions and Literature Review

A study guide to WGU's C225, the graduate education course on framing research questions and reviewing the literature.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min read

C225 Research Questions and Literature Review is the second course in Western Governors University's graduate education research sequence, where a broad interest becomes a focused, researchable question.

WGU describes the course as focusing on how to conduct a thorough literature review that addresses and identifies important educational research topics, problems and questions, and helps determine the appropriate kind of research and data needed to answer research questions and hypotheses.

C224 Research Foundations is the prerequisite, and WGU's program guides list C225 at two competency units.

The hardest step is usually narrowing. Teachers care about big issues, but a literature review needs a question small enough to review properly and, later, to study.

Course at a Glance

ItemDetails
UniversityWestern Governors University (WGU)
Course codeC225
LevelGraduate (education), competency-based
Competency units2
PrerequisiteC224 Research Foundations
Typical workResearch questions and hypotheses, literature searches, a written review

What C225 Covers

SkillWhat it involves
Identifying problemsSpotting important, researchable issues in education
Framing questionsWriting focused research questions and, where suitable, hypotheses
SearchingFinding relevant, credible sources in databases such as ERIC
SynthesizingOrganizing findings by theme and identifying gaps
Linking to methodDeciding what kind of research and data would answer the question

Writing Good Research Questions

A good question is specific about population, variable or phenomenon, and setting. It is answerable with data you could realistically collect, and it matters to practice.

Example: "How can we improve maths?" becomes "What is the effect of daily number talks on Grade 3 students' mental computation fluency over eight weeks?" The revised question names the intervention, population, outcome and timeframe, and points towards a quantitative design. A paired hypothesis might predict that students receiving number talks will show greater gains than a comparison group.

Qualitative questions use open wording such as "how" or "what are the experiences of", and usually do not need hypotheses.

Synthesis, Not Summary

The most common weakness in literature reviews is source-by-source summary. Synthesis organizes the review by themes or debates and shows how studies agree, disagree or leave gaps.

Example: Instead of "Smith (2019) found... Lee (2021) found...", write "Several studies report fluency gains from short daily routines (Lee, 2021; Smith, 2019), although most involved small samples in single schools, leaving open whether the effect holds across settings." One sentence compares, evaluates and identifies a gap.

A synthesis matrix, a table with sources as rows and themes, methods and findings as columns, makes this much easier.

Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them

Task typeWhat it testsHow to approach it
Research question developmentFocus and feasibilityNarrow until population and outcome are clear
Annotated sourcesSource evaluationSummary, quality, relevance to question
Literature reviewSynthesisOrganize by themes, identify gaps
Method rationaleLinking question to dataExplain what data would answer it

Evaluating Source Quality

Not every published article deserves equal weight. Check whether it is peer-reviewed, how large and relevant the sample was, whether the design suits the claim and how recent it is. A large, well-designed study in a similar setting should influence your review more than a small opinion piece, and your writing should make that weighting visible.

Structuring the Written Review

A clear review usually opens by defining the topic and its importance, moves through two to four themes, and closes by naming the gap your question addresses. Headings for each theme help the reader, and a short summary at the end of each theme keeps the argument moving towards your question rather than drifting into a catalog of studies.

Where Students Get Stuck

Study Tips for C225

How We Help with C225

Send the task instructions, rubric, your topic or draft question, sources and any evaluator feedback. An education research writer helps you narrow the question, prepares a custom review section, or reviews your draft for synthesis and structure. See our literature review help guide for more on the method.

GradeEssays is independent of Western Governors University. Our help is for study and reference; write and submit your own work under WGU's academic integrity policy. Orders are written from scratch with free revisions within the scope of your original request.

Turn Your Topic into a Researchable Question

Share your C225 instructions, sources and feedback. A writer prepares a custom review section or checks your draft.

Start My C225 Help

Free revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the prerequisite for C225?

WGU lists C224 Research Foundations as the prerequisite.

How many competency units is C225?

WGU's program guides list C225 at two competency units.

Do I need a hypothesis?

Quantitative questions often pair with hypotheses. Qualitative questions usually do not. Follow your task instructions.

Where should I search for education research?

ERIC and other education databases through your university library are the best starting points.

How do I avoid summarizing each source?

Organize by themes and compare studies within each theme, noting agreements, disagreements and gaps.

Is GradeEssays affiliated with WGU?

No. We are independent of Western Governors University.