ACCT 320, Fraud Detection and Deterrence, is a 3-credit undergraduate course at University of Maryland Global Campus, with ACCT 220 or ACCT 301 as the prerequisite.
UMGC describes it as a study of the principles behind, and standards for, examining, identifying, detecting and deterring fraud. You learn to differentiate types of fraud, assess organizational characteristics that make fraud more likely and develop a plan to detect and deter it.
UMGC lists a long range of topics: the fraud triangle, cash larceny, check tampering, skimming, register disbursement schemes, cash receipts schemes, billing schemes, payroll and expense reimbursement issues, asset misappropriation, corruption, accounting principles and fraud, fraudulent financial statements, whistleblowing, interviewing witnesses and writing reports.
The course also focuses on creating meaningful data visualizations for stakeholders, so you need to present findings, not just find them.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) |
| Course code | ACCT 320 |
| Credits | 3 |
| Prerequisite | ACCT 220 or ACCT 301 |
| Subject area | Fraud examination and forensic accounting |
| Typical work | Scheme analyses, fraud risk assessments, deterrence plans, data visualizations, reports |
What ACCT 320 Covers
| Area | Examples from UMGC's topic list |
|---|---|
| Why fraud happens | The fraud triangle; organizational characteristics conducive to fraud |
| Cash schemes | Skimming, cash larceny, cash receipts schemes, check tampering, register disbursements |
| Disbursement schemes | Billing, payroll and expense reimbursement issues |
| Other schemes | Asset misappropriation, corruption, fraudulent financial statements |
| Response | Whistleblowing, interviewing witnesses, writing reports |
| Communication | Data visualizations for stakeholders |
Key Concepts Explained
The Fraud Triangle
The fraud triangle explains occupational fraud through three elements: pressure (a financial or personal need), opportunity (a weakness that lets fraud happen and stay hidden) and rationalization (the story the fraudster tells to justify it). Organizations have the most control over opportunity, which is why deterrence plans focus on controls.
Skimming Versus Cash Larceny
The difference is timing. Skimming takes cash before the sale is recorded, so there is no record to reconcile. Cash larceny takes cash after it has been recorded, so the books show money that is missing.
Example: A cashier rings up only some sales and pockets cash from the rest: skimming, detectable through analytics such as comparing sales per shift or inventory shrinkage. A clerk removes cash from the recorded day's takings before the bank deposit: larceny, detectable by comparing the register total with the deposit slip and the bank statement.
Billing Schemes and Red Flags
In a shell company scheme, an employee creates a fake vendor and approves invoices from it. Red flags include a vendor address matching an employee's address, invoices just below approval limits and sequential invoice numbers from one supplier.
Example: Matching the vendor master file against the employee address file reveals a supplier registered to a purchasing clerk's home address. Its 14 invoices this year are all between $4,800 and $4,990, just below a $5,000 second-approval threshold. Both findings call for investigation.
Fraudulent Financial Statements
Unlike asset theft, financial statement fraud usually involves management misstating results, for example by recognizing revenue early, hiding liabilities or inflating asset values. The amounts tend to be larger and the concealment more sophisticated.
Warning signs include revenue growing much faster than cash from operations, unusual entries near period-end and aggressive targets tied to bonuses. Analyzing trends and ratios over several periods is often the first step in spotting it.
Presenting Fraud Findings Visually
UMGC's emphasis on data visualization reflects real practice: findings have to persuade managers, boards and sometimes investigators. Choose a chart that answers one question.
A bar chart can compare refunds by cashier; a line chart can show expenses spiking around month-end; a histogram can reveal clusters of invoices just below an approval limit. Title each chart with the finding, label axes clearly and avoid decoration. Pair each visual with two or three sentences explaining what it shows and what action it supports.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach |
|---|---|---|
| Scheme analysis | Identifying fraud types | Name the scheme, how it worked and how it was concealed |
| Fraud risk assessment | Organizational vulnerability | Use the fraud triangle to structure the risks |
| Detection and deterrence plan | Practical controls | Match each risk with preventive and detective measures |
| Visualization or report | Communicating to stakeholders | Lead with the finding; one clear chart per message |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Confusing schemes. Learn the defining feature of each, especially timing for cash schemes.
- Generic controls. Tie each control to a named risk in the case.
- Ignoring culture. Tone at the top and whistleblowing channels belong in a deterrence plan.
- Cluttered visuals. Simpler charts communicate findings better.
Study Tips for ACCT 320
- Make a table of schemes with how each works, how it is hidden and how it is detected.
- Read real fraud cases and practice classifying them.
- Practice building simple charts in Excel from transaction data.
- Learn the structure of a fraud examination report.
How We Help with ACCT 320
Send the case, instructions, rubric and any data. A forensic accounting tutor can explain schemes and controls, prepare a custom analysis or plan for reference, or review your draft and visuals. See our accounting assignment help guide for more.
GradeEssays is independent of University of Maryland Global Campus. Our work is tutoring and reference material; submit your own work under UMGC's academic integrity policy. Every order is written from scratch and refunded in full if late.
Make Your ACCT 320 Fraud Analysis Convincing
Share the case and your draft. We prepare a custom analysis and plan you can learn from.
Start My ACCT 320 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
UMGC lists ACCT 220 or ACCT 301.
UMGC lists it as a 3-credit course.
A model explaining fraud through pressure, opportunity and rationalization.
Skimming takes cash before it is recorded; cash larceny takes it after it is recorded.
Yes. UMGC says the course focuses on creating and communicating meaningful data visualizations for stakeholders.
Yes. Send the draft and rubric and we will explain how to strengthen it.