ACC-705, Advanced Topics in Information Systems and Controls, is a graduate course at Southern New Hampshire University.
SNHU lists it in the Information Systems and Controls path of its CPA certificate programs, alongside ACC-640 Auditing, ACC-676 Audit of Accounting Information Systems and ACC-677 Information System Assurance and Advising.
SNHU states that these certificates were aligned to the discipline areas of the 2024 CPA exam, so ACC-705 sits close to the ISC (Information Systems and Controls) discipline.
The course is challenging because it asks accountants to think like technology risk professionals. You need to understand how data moves through systems, where it can be lost, changed or exposed, and which controls give reasonable assurance, then explain all of that in language a finance audience understands.
Course at a Glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| University | Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) |
| Course code | ACC-705 |
| Level | Graduate |
| Program path | Information Systems and Controls certificate path |
| CPA alignment | Close to the ISC discipline of the CPA exam |
| Typical work | Case analyses, control evaluations, research papers |
ISC Areas the Course Relates To
The CPA exam's ISC discipline is organized around three broad areas. These are a useful map for the kinds of topics an advanced systems and controls course explores; your syllabus gives ACC-705's exact content.
| ISC area | What it covers in practice |
|---|---|
| Information systems and data management | IT infrastructure, business processes, data governance, data integrity and availability |
| Security, confidentiality and privacy | Threats, access controls, incident response, and protecting personal and confidential data |
| SOC engagements | Planning and performing System and Organization Controls engagements and using their reports |
Key Concepts Explained
Defense in Depth
No single control stops every threat. Organizations layer preventive, detective and corrective controls so that if one fails, another catches the problem. A good analysis identifies which layer each control belongs to and where gaps remain.
Example: A finance system uses passwords (preventive). Adding multi-factor authentication strengthens prevention, logging failed logins adds detection, and a tested incident response plan adds correction. If logs exist but nobody reviews them, the detective layer exists on paper only.
Data Integrity Across Interfaces
Many reporting errors start where two systems exchange data. Controls such as record counts, control totals and reconciliations confirm that what left one system arrived complete and unchanged in the other.
Example: A payroll system sends a file to the general ledger. The file carries a record count of 1,250 and a hash total. The ledger import checks both; a mismatch stops the posting and alerts the payroll team before the error reaches the financial statements.
SOC 1 Versus SOC 2
A SOC 1 report addresses controls at a service organization relevant to a user entity's financial reporting. A SOC 2 report addresses controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality or privacy. Type 1 reports cover design at a point in time; Type 2 reports also cover operating effectiveness over a period.
Governance and Frameworks
Advanced systems and controls work leans on recognized frameworks. COSO's internal control framework gives the overall structure of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring.
COBIT is widely used for IT governance and management objectives, and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework organizes security activities into functions such as identify, protect, detect, respond and recover. Assignments often reward students who pick one framework, explain why it fits the case and apply it consistently, rather than mentioning several in passing.
Typical Assignments and How to Approach Them
| Assignment type | What it tests | How to approach |
|---|---|---|
| Control evaluation | Design and operation | Map risks to controls, then test whether each control would work |
| Data flow analysis | Understanding of systems | Draw the flow first and mark every hand-off point |
| SOC report review | Using assurance reports | Check scope, period, exceptions and user entity controls |
| Research paper | Emerging risks | Focus on one technology and its control implications |
Where Students Get Stuck
- Technical jargon without meaning. Explain each control's purpose in business terms.
- Ignoring the user entity's own controls. SOC reports rely on complementary controls at the client.
- Listing frameworks instead of applying one. Depth beats breadth.
- Missing the reporting impact. Link control failures back to possible misstatements or disclosures.
Study Tips for ACC-705
- Learn the five COSO components and be able to give an IT example of each.
- Sketch data flows for every case before writing.
- Read a sample SOC 2 report to see the structure.
- Use the AICPA's published ISC blueprint as a checklist for exam-related topics.
How We Help with ACC-705
Send the assignment prompt, case materials, rubric and any feedback. A writer with IT audit and controls knowledge can explain concepts, prepare a custom analysis for reference, or review your draft for gaps. Our accounting assignment help guide covers other accounting modules.
GradeEssays is independent of Southern New Hampshire University. Our work is tutoring and reference only: use it to understand the material, then complete and submit your own work under SNHU's academic integrity policy. Every order is written from scratch with free revisions within the scope of your original request.
Get on Top of ACC-705
Share the prompt and your draft. We prepare an explained custom analysis of the controls and risks involved.
Start My ACC-705 HelpFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
SNHU lists ACC-705 in the Information Systems and Controls path of its CPA certificates, with ACC-640, ACC-676 and ACC-677.
No. It is a university course. SNHU says its CPA certificates were aligned to the 2024 CPA exam discipline areas, so the topics overlap with ISC.
It helps, but the focus is on controls and risk. Understanding how systems process data matters more than coding.
Type 1 covers the design of controls at a point in time; Type 2 also tests whether they operated effectively over a period.
Use the one your instructor specifies. Otherwise, COSO for internal control, COBIT for IT governance, or NIST for cybersecurity, depending on the question.
Yes. Send the draft and rubric and we will explain how to strengthen the analysis.