A reflective essay examines an experience you have had and what you learned from it. In education, nursing, social work, business and teacher training it is often assessed formally, using a named model such as Gibbs' reflective cycle.
In other courses it may be a looser reflection on a project, a placement or your development as a writer.
Many reflective essays lose marks for the same reason: they describe what happened in detail and say little about why it happened, what it means and what the writer will do differently. Reflection is analysis of your own experience. This guide explains the main models, how to structure your essay and how to write in a way that is personal yet academic.
Quick Answer
Choose a specific experience, then work through a reflective model: describe it briefly, explore your thoughts and feelings, evaluate what went well and badly, analyze why using theory or research, conclude what you learned, and set a concrete action plan. Write in the first person, keep description to a minority of the word count, support your analysis with academic sources where the brief requires them, and protect the confidentiality of anyone involved.
What Reflective Writing Is
Reflection moves from what happened to what it means. One useful way to see this is as levels of depth: descriptive writing reports events; descriptive reflection adds some reasons and feelings; dialogic reflection steps back and considers different perspectives and explanations; critical reflection links the experience to wider contexts such as theory, power, ethics or organizational culture.
Higher marks usually go to work that reaches the dialogic and critical levels.
| Descriptive writing | Reflective writing |
|---|---|
| "The patient became agitated and I called my mentor." | "I called my mentor quickly, partly from good judgment and partly because I felt out of my depth. Looking at this through Benner's novice-to-expert model helps explain why I relied on rules rather than reading the situation." |
| Recounts events in order | Questions why events unfolded as they did |
| Focuses on others' actions | Examines your own assumptions, feelings and choices |
| Ends when the event ends | Ends with learning and a plan |
The Main Reflective Models
| Model | Stages | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Gibbs' reflective cycle (1988) | Description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, action plan | Structured essays on a single event; very common in nursing and education |
| Kolb's experiential learning cycle (1984) | Concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, active experimentation | Reflecting on learning over time or a skill being developed |
| Driscoll's model | What? So what? Now what? | Short reflections, logs and portfolios |
| Schön (1983) | Reflection-in-action (during) and reflection-on-action (afterwards) | Discussing how you think on your feet in professional practice |
| Johns' model of structured reflection | Cue questions on aesthetics, personal, ethics, empirics and reflexivity | Deeper reflection on complex or ethical situations |
Use the model your brief names. If none is specified, Gibbs gives the clearest essay structure and Driscoll suits shorter pieces.
Writing with Gibbs' Reflective Cycle
| Stage | Questions | Suggested share |
|---|---|---|
| Description | What happened? Where, when, who was involved? | 10 to 15% |
| Feelings | What were you thinking and feeling at the time? | About 10% |
| Evaluation | What went well? What went badly? | 15% |
| Analysis | Why did things go as they did? What does theory or research say? | 30 to 35% |
| Conclusion | What did you learn? What else could you have done? | 15% |
| Action plan | What will you do differently next time, and how? | 10 to 15% |
Analysis is the largest section because it is where you explain the experience using evidence. Many weak reflections invert this, spending half the essay on description.
Worked Example: Gibbs in Brief
Description: During a group project in my second-year business module, our team missed an interim deadline because two members' sections arrived late. As team coordinator, I had set the internal deadlines.
Feelings: I felt frustrated with the late members and embarrassed in front of our tutor, and I worried the rest of the team saw it as my failure.
Evaluation: The work we did submit was strong, and the team communicated openly once the problem surfaced. However, I had not checked progress between the kick-off meeting and the deadline.
Analysis: Tuckman's model of group development suggests we were still in the "storming" stage, with roles and expectations unclear. I had assumed agreement in the first meeting meant commitment. Research on virtual teams also shows that without regular check-ins, problems stay hidden until deadlines.
Conclusion: I learned that coordination means monitoring progress, not just setting dates, and that unclear roles were a bigger issue than individual effort.
Action plan: In my next group project I will agree written roles at the first meeting and hold a ten-minute weekly check-in, and I will ask for draft sections a week before internal deadlines.
In a full essay, each stage would be developed into one or more paragraphs and the analysis would cite the theory and research properly.
Using Kolb and Driscoll
Kolb's cycle works well when you are reflecting on learning a skill over a period, such as presenting, clinical procedures or academic writing.
Describe a concrete experience, reflect on what you observed, form a general principle (often supported by theory), and explain how you tested it in a new situation. The final stage, active experimentation, becomes the next concrete experience, so Kolb suits essays that cover several attempts.
Driscoll's three questions are ideal for short reflections, journal entries and placement logs. "What?" covers the event, "So what?" its significance and the learning, and "Now what?" the actions you will take. Keep "What?" brief and develop "So what?" with evidence.
Linking Reflection to Theory
At university level, reflection is expected to connect personal experience to academic ideas. This shows that you can explain your experience, not just report it. Choose theory that genuinely illuminates what happened.
| Field | Theories often used in reflection |
|---|---|
| Nursing and health | Benner's novice to expert, therapeutic communication, NMC Code or relevant professional standards, person-centered care |
| Education | Constructivism, Bloom's taxonomy, assessment for learning, behavior management approaches |
| Business and management | Tuckman's team stages, leadership styles, Belbin team roles, motivation theories |
| Social work | Anti-oppressive practice, systems theory, strengths-based approaches |
Writing a Specific Action Plan
The action plan is where many reflections fall flat. "I will improve my communication" tells the marker nothing. A good action plan is specific, realistic and checkable: it says what you will do, when or in what situation, and how you will know it worked. Some students find it helpful to frame each action as a SMART goal.
| Vague | Specific |
|---|---|
| I will be more confident. | I will volunteer to give the handover summary on my next two placement shifts and ask my mentor for one point of feedback each time. |
| I will manage my time better. | I will break each assignment into weekly tasks in a planner and check progress with a study partner every Friday. |
| I will learn more about dementia care. | I will complete the trust's dementia awareness module before my next placement and apply one communication technique from it. |
Reflection-in-Action and Reflection-on-Action
Schön's distinction is useful in professional courses because it captures two kinds of thinking. Reflection-in-action happens during an event: noticing that a planned approach is not working and adjusting on the spot. Reflection-on-action happens afterwards, when you review what happened and why.
A strong reflective essay can show both: what you noticed and changed in the moment, and what you understood later when you had time to think and read. Showing reflection-in-action is a good way to demonstrate developing professional judgment.
Reflective Language
Reflective essays are written in the first person, but they remain academic. Use tentative, analytical language and avoid casual expressions.
- "At the time, I assumed that..."
- "On reflection, I can see that..."
- "This may have been because..."
- "This is consistent with research suggesting..."
- "A different approach would have been to..."
- "In future, I will..."
Structure of a Reflective Essay
If you are using Gibbs, its six stages can be your headings or your paragraph plan. Otherwise, a reliable structure is: an introduction that names the experience, its context and the model you will use; body sections that follow the model; and a conclusion that summarizes the key learning and the action plan.
Many briefs ask for a short note on confidentiality in the introduction.
Confidentiality and Honesty
In professional courses, never name patients, service users, clients, colleagues or placement sites. Use pseudonyms or general descriptions ("a patient in their seventies", "a large secondary school") and state that names have been changed.
Reflective essays must be honest accounts of real experiences. Do not invent events or improve your actions after the fact; markers value candid analysis of mistakes far more than a story where everything went perfectly.
Reflective Journals, Logs and Portfolios
Not all reflective writing is a single essay. Placement journals, learning logs and professional portfolios ask you to reflect regularly on several experiences. Each entry can be short, often a few hundred words structured by Driscoll's questions, but the same principles apply: brief description, honest analysis and a clear next step.
When a portfolio ends with a summative reflection, read back through your entries and look for patterns, such as a skill that improved, a situation that kept recurring or a belief that changed. That overview of your development, supported by examples from the entries, is usually what the final assessment is looking for.
Common Mistakes
- Too much description and too little analysis.
- Feelings stated but not explored ("I felt nervous").
- No theory or research when the brief requires it.
- A vague action plan ("I will communicate better").
- Breaching confidentiality by naming people or places.
- Choosing an experience with nothing to learn from it.
How GradeEssays Helps with Reflective Essays
Send your brief, the reflective model required, the word count and your notes on the real experience: what happened, how you felt, what you think went well or badly.
A writer in your field drafts a model reflection built only on your details, structured by the model, with analysis linked to relevant theory and a specific action plan, or edits your own draft to deepen it.
We never invent experiences. Work is checked for originality, revisions within the scope of your original request are free, and your identity is never shared with the writer.
Turn Your Experience into a Strong Reflection
Share your brief, required model and your own experience notes. A writer drafts a model reflection that links what happened to theory and future practice.
Start My Reflective EssayFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Reflective essays are written in the first person because they analyze your own experience.
At university level, usually yes, to support your analysis with theory and research. Check your brief for the number expected.
Use the one your brief names. Gibbs is the most common for structured essays; Driscoll suits short reflections; Kolb suits learning over time.
Keep description short, roughly 10 to 15% of the essay, and spend most of your words on evaluation, analysis and learning.
Yes. Mistakes and difficult situations often produce the best reflection, as long as you analyze them honestly and show learning.
Use analytical language, link your experience to theory, and focus on reasons and learning rather than emotional storytelling.
A narrative essay tells a story with a point. A reflective essay analyses an experience, often with a formal model and theory, and ends with learning and future action.
No. We work only from your real experience and notes, either drafting a model from them or editing your draft.