MCH8008 Assessment 2

Individual Essay (60% of total grade)

  • An individual essay of 2500 words (+/-5%). Students are asked to produce a critical examination contextualizing and analysing a public relations/promotional culture issue.
  • You must assess the strengths and weaknesses of approaches and theories in the study of the media and promotional culture. This assessment will allow you to familiarise yourself with theories, problems and issues raised in the module and to develop a critical understanding of the intersection of media, society and promotional culture.
  • Academic Essay: 2,500 words
  • Deadline: 4pm on Thursday, 09 January 2025
  • Submit anonymously via Canvas i.e. do not put your name on your script

Choose ONE of the following questions:

  1. Critically evaluate the roles of agenda-setting and gatekeeping and the media’s influence on public discourse and opinion formation. Discuss how these processes are applied in contemporary media practices, particularly in the context of digital platforms and social media, where traditional gatekeeping roles are disrupted.

Explore ethical considerations and use real-world examples to illustrate your argument.

  • Analyse how the role of celebrities and influencers in advertising and promotional culture has evolved and grown in significance with the rise of social and digital media.

Discuss this influencer marketing role using relevant theories and models, UK law and regulatory frameworks, and draw on real-life examples to illustrate your argument.

  • Examine how global brands shape and influence local cultures through their promotional activities, while considering how cultural contexts impact the strategies and success of these brands. Consider the ethical dilemmas associated with the cultural transformations brought about by global promotional practices.

Your answer should engage with relevant theories and critically assess their strengths and limitations. Use practical examples to illustrate your arguments.

  • Using theories from the module and your own contextual examples, critically evaluate the effectiveness of contemporary advertising promotion strategies (i.e., from the last 1-2 years) that employ one of the following:
  • Humour
  • Shock
  • Branded/native content

You will be assessed against the following criteria:

  • Quality of definition of a contemporary media issue, informed by engagement with and understanding of appropriate research;
  • A balanced and clear discussion of the weaknesses and strengths of methodological and theoretical approaches pertinent to the issue at hand;
  • A critical and analytical discussion of intersections between media and promotional culture and consequences;
  • Coherence and written structure of the research essay, including appropriate academic tone at postgraduate level and effective display of media text and analysis.

Assessment Guidance Notes

  • You should use recent case studies in support of your arguments. Recent or contemporary is understood to mean from 2022 onwards. You may of course use historical examples as context for comparison, but your essay must include recent examples as the main context.
  • You must source and Harvard reference all quotations that you use. Try to include the different theories and definitions that we have discussed in the module that are relevant to your question.
  • Remember that the essay questions are designed to check your understanding of the material covered in the MCH8008 module. You may draw upon resources from other modules you are studying, but you are encouraged to independently research materials beyond the module.
  • This is a Master’s level essay, so we expect to Analyse, Evaluate and Critically Engage with the different theories and NOT just describe.
  • Your work should be in 12-point type on 1.5 or 2.0 line spacing. Please use an English UK spellcheck (e.g. behaviour; programme; specialise etc).
  • The word limit for this assessment (excluding the bibliography) is 2500 words. You are allowed to write between 2325 and 2625 words without penalty and your word count MUST be included on the cover page.
  • If you go under or over the word count above, you will lose 5 marks.
  • Please see the clear guidance within the MCH8008 Module Handbook for information about how to submit your assessment and assessment penalties.
  • There is also information about submission procedures on Canvas – see: Style Guide for Academic Writing
  • A discussion forum will be set up where you can post queries about the assessment. Please use this forum first before emailing tutors. The discussion forum will open at 9am on Friday, 29 November 2024 and will close at 6pm on Friday, 20 December 2024. Between 23 December 2024 – 6 January 2025 the Discussion Forum will not be monitored.
  • The deadline for this essay, which comprises 60% of the total grade for this module, is 4pm on Thursday, January 09, 2025, and you must submit an electronic copy via Canvas.

Deadlines and Return of Marks

Submit your work for all assessment before or on the day of the deadline, before 4pm. Do not aim to submit at 4pm.

DescriptionDeadlinePercentage of the mark for the moduleSubmission modeDeadline for mark and feedback to students
Assessment 2Thursday, 09 January 202560%Submit via CanvasThursday, February 06, 2025

Submission Procedure

Assessments must be submitted electronically through Canvas before 4pm on the day of the deadline. As the submission process can take some time, leave plenty of time for this; aim to submit no later than 3.50. Submission works as follows:

  • Title your document with the module code and your student number as follows: MCH8008_123456789. If you are writing your work using the Pages software, please save it as a pdf file.
  • Go to the module’s Canvas site and find the ‘Assignments’ area.
  • Select the appropriate assignment. You will notice that if the deadline has passed, the ‘on-time’ submission point for the assignment has been replaced with a ‘late submissions’ point for the same assignment. Submitting here does not automatically incur a mark penalty – our programme secretaries will take into account whether you have an extension when recording students’ marks.
  • Click ‘Start Assignment’.
  • In the resulting dialogue box, use the ‘Choose file’ and ‘Add another file’ buttons to select the file/s you wish to submit. Canvas has a 5GB file size limit, so it is unlikely that your file/s will be too big to upload. There will no opportunity to preview your files before submission, so be very careful at this stage that you have selected the right file/s. If you find that you have made a mistake, just use the Cancel button.
  • There is usually no need for you to provide use the Comments box. Avoid providing any information in the Comments box that might identify you.
  • Click ‘Submit Assignment’. The larger your file, the longer it will take for the submission process to occur.
  • If you have successfully submitted your assignment, the submission page will change to display a ‘Submission’ column of text on the right showing the word ‘Submitted!’ and the date and time submitted. If you have successfully submitted, the ‘Submit Assignment’ button will have changed to a ‘New attempt’ button. If this has not happened, you have not submitted your work and should try again. If you need to provide evidence that you have submitted, simply re-visit the relevant submission page and take a screenshot so as to include the ‘Submitted!’ etc. text.

Extensions and Other Adjustments

Students with legitimate reasons for being unable to submit assessed work by the published deadline (e.g. personal illness, serious illness of a close relative or bereavement) should submit a Personal Extenuating Circumstances (PEC) Form, together with supporting evidence, electronically via the Student Self-Service Portal, to request an extension, a deferral to the next normal round of assessment, or one of a range of other adjustments. PEC forms should be submitted in advance of the original deadline if possible, but can be accepted after the deadline if the extenuating circumstances do not permit it to be submitted beforehand. Decisions on extensions and other adjustments are made by Senior Tutor, and cannot be made by module leaders, seminar leaders or personal tutors. Students will usually be notified of the decision (or status of the PEC request) within 5 working days.

Criteria of Assessment for Essays and other scholarly work (taught postgraduate level)

Note: The guidance notes under ‘Assessment’ (above) will also be taken into consideration.

 Classmark →Low Fail 0-45High Fail 45-49Pass 50-59Merit 60-69Distinction
Criteria ↓70-7980-8990-100
Knowledge & UnderstandingRange of primary and secondary material discussedEvidence of having studied few or no relevant materials.Evidence of having studied a very narrow range of material. Relies on a limited number of sources and stays entirely with materials covered in teaching.Evidence of having studied a reasonable range of material. Stays largely within materials covered in teaching but uses some recommended materials.Evidence of having studied a wide range of material. Goes some way beyond material covered in teaching, using a wide range of recommended materials.Evidence of having studied an ambitious in range of material. Considerably exceeds material covered in teaching. Introduces material found through independent study.Evidence of having studied an exceptional range of material.Evidence of having studied an outstanding range of material.
Demonstration of understandingShows little or no understanding of relevant concepts.Showslimited understanding of basic concepts.Shows reasonable understanding of some complex concepts.Shows good understanding of a reasonable number of complex concepts.Shows excellent understanding of a good range of complex concepts.Either the range or the understanding of complex concepts is exceptional.Shows exceptional understanding of a wide range of complex concepts.
Research, Argument & Critical ThinkingCritical analysisNo critical analysis. No awareness of the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Almost entirely descriptive with very little critical comment. Little awareness of the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Largely descriptive with little critical comment. Some awareness of the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Some good critical analysis. Good awareness of the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Independent critical analysis. Excellent recognition of the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Exceptional critical analysis. Insight is provided into trends in the strengths/ limitations of the material used.Outstanding critical analysis. Publication-quality understanding of strengths/ limitations of the material used.
Quality and use of evidence/dataThe argument is based on very little or no appropriate evidence. Little to no judgement is exhibited in use of evidence.The argument uses little evidence or inappropriate evidence. Limited judgement is exhibited in use of evidence.Sufficient appropriate evidence is presented to achieve the aims and objectives of the assignment. Reasonable judgement is exhibited in use of evidence.The argument is well-supported by a good body ofappropriate evidence. Good judgement is exhibited in use of evidence.The argument is supported very well by a substantial body of well-chosen evidence. Skill and confidence are exhibited in use of evidence.Evidence of exceptional breadth or depth is presented to support the argument. Sophisticated judgement is applied in using this evidence.Evidence of exceptional breadth and depth is presented to support the argument. Outstanding judgement is applied in using this evidence.
Independence and originality of thought in connecting ideasLittle to no marshallingof ideas. No linkages are established. Argument is absent or very poor.Limited marshalling of ideas. Few or no linkages are established, leading to a weak argument.Reasonable marshalling of ideas; some linkages are established. Argument is reasonable.Disparate ideas are pulled together effectively. The work establishes robust linkages. Argument is well-developed.Independent and original synthesis of ideas. An excellent, persuasive argument.Exceptional synthesis of ideas. Argument is worthy of publication with revisions.Outstanding synthesis of ideas. Argument merits publication with few or no revisions.
ExecutionOrganisation of contentLittle or no indication of a structured discussion.Careless or confused structure.Reasonable structure.A well-organised discussion with a clear structure.A clear and concise structure that contributes very well to the discussion.Organisation is exceptionally reader-friendly.Organisation is beyond improvement.
Layout of document and accuracy of referencingVery poor layout. Very poor referencing.Insufficient care is taken in layout and in referencing.Reasonable care is taken in layout and in referencing.A high level of care is taken in layout and in referencing.Excellent care is taken in layout and in referencing.Layout and referencing are both flawless.Layout demonstrates creativity. Referencing is flawless.
Clarity and fluency of expressionEntirely or largely unclear and lacking in fluency.More than half of the expression is unclear; the work has few fluent elements.At least half of the work is clearly expressed; the work has some fluent elements.The majority of the work is clearly expressed in fluent language.With no more than minor exceptions, the work is clearly expressed in fluent language.The whole work is clearly expressed in fluent language.The whole work is efficiently and expertly expressed in highly fluent language.
Stressed over that homework?

Essay deadline breathing down your neck?

Let’s cut to the chase: Why struggle when you can ace it with zero hassle?

Whether it’s essays, research papers, or assignments — we’ve got you covered.

✅ Expert writers
✅ 100% original work
✅ No AI tools, just real pros

Stressed about your essay or homework? Get a top-quality custom essay NOW!!! Stop worrying. Start succeeding.

GradeEssays.com
We are GradeEssays.com, the best college essay writing service. We offer educational and research assistance to assist our customers in managing their academic work. At GradeEssays.com, we promise quality and 100% original essays written from scratch.
Contact Us

Enjoy 24/7 customer support for any queries or concerns you have.

Phone: +1 213 3772458

Email: support@gradeessays.com

© 2024 - GradeEssays.com. All rights reserved.

WE HAVE A GIFT FOR YOU!

15% OFF 🎁

Get 15% OFF on your order with us

Scroll to Top